Comments Thread For: Gervonta Davis-Ryan Garcia: Rematch Clause Favors Davis In Contracts For April 22 PPV Fight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Gervonta Davis-Ryan Garcia: Rematch Clause Favors Davis In Contracts For April 22 PPV Fight

    Gervonta Davis joked during his post-fight press conference January 8 that Ryan Garcia agreed to virtually everything proposed in their contracts for a pay-per-view showdown that was finalized last week for April 22.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • RJJ-94-02=GOAT
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2017
    • 28750
    • 9,158
    • 2,029
    • 246,831

    #2
    Tank isn’t gonna need that rematch clause.

    Comment

    • Malvado
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2022
      • 4507
      • 1,334
      • 719
      • 0

      #3
      Why? Why does Davis want a immediate rematch? If Ryan loses he doesn't get the remach clause, is Tank not that confident that he will win?

      Comment

      • RJJ-94-02=GOAT
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2017
        • 28750
        • 9,158
        • 2,029
        • 246,831

        #4
        Originally posted by Escorpion
        Why? Why does Davis want a immediate rematch? If Ryan loses he doesn't get the remach clause, is Tank not that confident that he will win?
        Just how the business is these days. I bet Joshua has a rematch clause against Franklin for example, Fury probably had one against Chisora.

        I’d like to see these rematch clauses outlawed personally.

        Comment

        • luvgun
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 157
          • 52
          • 17
          • 6,639

          #5
          It has always been common for the A side to have options for a rematch. Look at Kamboso vs Haney - Nothing to see here.

          Comment

          • MrMORENO
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • May 2015
            • 440
            • 23
            • 18
            • 6,742

            #6
            Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT
            Tank isn’t gonna need that rematch clause.
            You be lettin Sukas Punch on you tho

            Comment

            • boxingitis
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Sep 2013
              • 6701
              • 1,914
              • 18
              • 23,227

              #7
              Wack. Tank not confident he will win.

              Comment

              • jonnyc420
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Sep 2015
                • 7457
                • 2,170
                • 1,072
                • 53,984

                #8
                Rematch clause for a non championship bout? Boxing continues to become a joke. To me this stinks of a lack of confidence on Porky's part.

                Comment

                • RJJ-94-02=GOAT
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2017
                  • 28750
                  • 9,158
                  • 2,029
                  • 246,831

                  #9
                  Originally posted by MrMORENO

                  You be lettin Sukas Punch on you tho
                  Do you speak English?

                  Comment

                  • juanpablo
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Sep 2004
                    • 995
                    • 1,247
                    • 565
                    • 8,107

                    #10
                    I don't see the "news" here. Davis is definitely the A-side so he'll have more favorable contract terms

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP