ESPN Women's P4P list is very questionable.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Queen_Leia
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2004
    • 4256
    • 312
    • 487
    • 30,245

    #1

    ESPN Women's P4P list is very questionable.

    So ESPN released it's women's pound for pound list and I have to say, I have a problem with this order & with some of the names on this list outright but I want to here opinions on it.


    1. Claressa Shields
    2. Katie Taylor
    3. Amanda Serrano
    4. Alycia Baumgarder
    5. Jessica McCaskill
    6. Mikaela Mayer
    7. Chantelle Cameron
    8. Seneisa Estrada
    9. Franchon Crews-Dezurn
    10. Natasha Jonas


    Also on a side note, does Skye Nicholson deserve to be on this list?​
    Last edited by Queen_Leia; 02-13-2023, 02:35 PM.
  • pretty boy_
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2015
    • 1191
    • 586
    • 104
    • 7,913

    #2
    Number 1 is correct. Super Bad Seniesa should be number 3 IMO. Other than that I’d say it’s aight.

    Comment

    • Queen_Leia
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2004
      • 4256
      • 312
      • 487
      • 30,245

      #3
      Originally posted by pretty boy_
      Number 1 is correct. Super Bad Seniesa should be number 3 IMO. Other than that I’d say it’s aight.

      Seniesa is a problem...she still hold the record for fastest KO in Boxing history?

      Comment

      • The D3vil
        WBA/WBC/WBO/IBF/Lineal
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2016
        • 6356
        • 1,625
        • 1,430
        • 56,286

        #4
        Mine would go.

        1. Shields
        2. Serrano
        3. Taylor
        4. Baumgardner
        5. Cameron
        6. Estrade
        7. Jonas
        8. Franchon
        9. Mayer
        10. McCaskill

        Shields & Serrano are multiweight phenomenons.

        I never understand why Taylor gets so much credit for basically parking at 135 and barely (if that) beating Persoon in the first fight.

        Serrano fought at 115 & 140 the same year and almost beat Taylor even thought she is naturally 2 weight classes smaller than Katie.

        Shields is undisputed in 3 different division.

        Comment

        • dannnnn
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2006
          • 1692
          • 950
          • 2,444
          • 19,273

          #5
          Even if there were only ten female boxers in total (which there may as well be), Jessica McCaskill wouldn't belong on a top ten list. She's horrendous.

          As for Mayer, I thought she should have got the nod over Baumgardner so she deserves her place for me. Skye Nicholson is probably good enough to be there, as is Savannah Marshall unless she's retired. I dunno, it's kind of hard to say who's very good in women's boxing because none of them are, really. Deciding who's better than who is a bit of a 'tallest midget' scenario.

          Comment

          • deathofaclown
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Apr 2015
            • 16322
            • 3,919
            • 50
            • 98,604

            #6
            People actually take it seriously?

            the only thread needed on women’s boxing happened last week, regarding who is the best looking.

            The talent pool in women’s boxing is horrendous. You have a handful of women boxers who have some ok technique through enough practice. The other 99.9% are lesbians who took up boxercise classes.

            That’s why you get completely useless women boxers winning world titles within 3 fights

            Im convinced if you were a woman who took boxing seriously for 6 months, you could become a pro and pick up a world title in some divisions.

            Comment

            • deathofaclown
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Apr 2015
              • 16322
              • 3,919
              • 50
              • 98,604

              #7
              Originally posted by The D3vil
              Mine would go.

              1. Shields
              2. Serrano
              3. Taylor
              4. Baumgardner
              5. Cameron
              6. Estrade
              7. Jonas
              8. Franchon
              9. Mayer
              10. McCaskill

              Shields & Serrano are multiweight phenomenons.

              I never understand why Taylor gets so much credit for basically parking at 135 and barely (if that) beating Persoon in the first fight.

              Serrano fought at 115 & 140 the same year and almost beat Taylor even thought she is naturally 2 weight classes smaller than Katie.

              Shields is undisputed in 3 different division.
              Chantelle Cameron might be the best out of all of them, she just hasn’t got the titles in multiple divisions.

              Taylor won’t fight her.

              Comment

              • removed
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Nov 2008
                • 21479
                • 4,005
                • 831
                • 164,542

                #8
                Originally posted by deathofaclown
                People actually take it seriously?

                the only thread needed on women’s boxing happened last week, regarding who is the best looking.

                The talent pool in women’s boxing is horrendous. You have a handful of women boxers who have some ok technique through enough practice. The other 99.9% are lesbians who took up boxercise classes.

                That’s why you get completely useless women boxers winning world titles within 3 fights

                Im convinced if you were a woman who took boxing seriously for 6 months, you could become a pro and pick up a world title in some divisions.
                The only competent female boxer is Shields, the rest of them are useless.

                Comment

                • The D3vil
                  WBA/WBC/WBO/IBF/Lineal
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Mar 2016
                  • 6356
                  • 1,625
                  • 1,430
                  • 56,286

                  #9
                  Originally posted by deathofaclown

                  Chantelle Cameron might be the best out of all of them, she just hasn’t got the titles in multiple divisions.

                  Taylor won’t fight her.
                  Yeah, Cameron's live against anybody from 135-147

                  Comment

                  • Shadoww702
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2015
                    • 41176
                    • 4,546
                    • 2,938
                    • 250,035

                    #10
                    Originally posted by The D3vil
                    Mine would go.

                    1. Shields
                    2. Serrano
                    3. Taylor
                    4. Baumgardner
                    5. Cameron
                    6. Estrade
                    7. Jonas
                    8. Franchon
                    9. Mayer
                    10. McCaskill

                    Shields & Serrano are multiweight phenomenons.

                    I never understand why Taylor gets so much credit for basically parking at 135 and barely (if that) beating Persoon in the first fight.

                    Serrano fought at 115 & 140 the same year and almost beat Taylor even thought she is naturally 2 weight classes smaller than Katie.

                    Shields is undisputed in 3 different division.
                    Last I saw Taylor beat Serrano?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP