Hopkins: "I can beat Mayweather easier than Pacquiao"

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hookoutofhell
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 2752
    • 82
    • 52
    • 9,101

    #41
    if we could scale up both mayweather and pacman and put them in the ring with hopkins i think mayweather would UD hopkin and pac would be U'Dd.

    stylistically speaking i think pacman would be a much easier fight for a guy like popkins who does well against southpaws and would rough up pacman on the inside. mayweather is a counter puncher as well but he can lead when he wants and would comfortably beat a fighter like hopkins.

    Comment

    • studentofthegam
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2009
      • 4127
      • 114
      • 107
      • 4,433

      #42
      Originally posted by mangler
      This is ******. Tho Bhop is #4 p4p to Mr boat buyer's #2, so I guess this is a fair fight at LHW right?
      No but 160 would be very competitive. Bhop loses on points. Dont sound to crazy to me.

      Originally posted by vercingetorix3
      Pointless question. Pacquiao versus Hopkins? Wow...why even bother...6 inch reach and 30 lbs. heavier, Hopkins would just be a bully at that point. He gets enough crap as is for his victories over Trinidad and De La Hoya.

      And as far as Mayweather is concerned...again too big and too strong...not to mention too boring. Counter-puncher versus counter-puncher? No man would commit.
      That what they said would happen with Marquez(a boring fight). But Floyd didnt mind going on the attack. I think PBF is actually one of the best when fighting with a height disadvantage. Wouldnt be that bigga problem.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP