Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Rocha On Crawford Fight: It's The Fight I Want Next, Let's Go

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Oregonian View Post
    ——-
    So what you are saying is that Crawford did not fight Khan or Brook or Avanesyan. That is some serious revisionist history. But stranger things have been said before.
    No , what he's saying is you go on about Crawford's past opponents like Error Sprintz Jr has a better resume or fought better opposition. And it total crap.
    only a total idiot would say the s.h.i.t you say.
    Come on here putting the next man down . Yet that man is still here at 147. Not running off to 154 avoiding all the smoke.

    Let's see you try defend that dude running to 154 ?

    Comment


    • #32
      Rocha got huge balls. Jaron "Boots" Ennis is available, but stopped mentioning Terence "Bud" Crawford's name. Can't see why taking this fight would shatter his IBF ambitions when there's plenty of time for that. And what's the point when they're both alphabet titles? WBO is ready at any moment for anyone to contest it, while the IBF still have to pick the deserving guy for the #2 spot. Right now they have none, unless a rematch with Karen with #4 spot.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by wrecksracer View Post
        Why does Crawford need Alex Roaches, again?
        Because Spence is circling the block?

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by ptek View Post

          No , what he's saying is you go on about Crawford's past opponents like Error Sprintz Jr has a better resume or fought better opposition. And it total crap.
          only a total idiot would say the s.h.i.t you say.
          Come on here putting the next man down . Yet that man is still here at 147. Not running off to 154 avoiding all the smoke.

          Let's see you try defend that dude running to 154 ?
          ———-
          An idiot is a person who assumes calling out Crawford’s weak resume is to support Spence.
          Unlike you and your other Crawford loyalists, I can criticize Spence. Spence should not be fighting Thurman. It’s a shït fight. Do you get that now?

          That said, Spence owns three belts at WW. How many does Crawford have? It’s simple math.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by wrecksracer View Post
            Why does Crawford need Alex Roaches, again?
            Because Oscar won't give him Ortiz Jr next and the Texas Drunk is running up to 154 to fight the Flute Player. Good stay busy fight unless you have a PBC fighter in mind who is willing to fight him other than the Texas Drunk who should be stripped of all of his belts if he fights at 154.

            Comment


            • #36
              Rocha preparing for his second loss

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Oregonian View Post
                ———-
                An idiot is a person who assumes calling out Crawford’s weak resume is to support Spence.
                Unlike you and your other Crawford loyalists, I can criticize Spence. Spence should not be fighting Thurman. It’s a shït fight. Do you get that now?


                That said, Spence owns three belts at WW. How many does Crawford have? It’s simple math.
                Error is holding those belts hostage. And hasn't defended the IBF Mando since Ocampo 2018. Now he's moving up avoiding all the smoke.
                There's a reason why you can't defend him. That **** he's been pulling for years now can't be defended.

                10 years 3 belts 1 division is lame. Only a weak ass would see it any different.

                Comment

                Working...
                X
                TOP