Comments Thread For: Alexis Rocha Knocks Out George Ashie In Seventh, Calls For Crawford Title Shot

[ptek]

——-
Again, you are such a juvenile idiot. Spence vs Thurman is a ****** fight. We are not up for it but for you, Crawford could fight Broner or now Rocha and it’s a great fight.

What a warthog’s hairy anus you are.

Both fights are not what anybody wants. But at least Crawford still in the same weight class making fights . What the hell is error upto at 154 ????

He needs to drop those belts and vacate.

[ptek]

——
You’d rather see Crawgord fight Rocha but not Boots or Ortiz or Spence? Seriously!

Seriously,
have you just crawled out from under a rock some place????

None of those other Fighters want any smoke , as the whole world can clearly see but you .

Error Sprintz Jr has done a runner upto 154, Boot's is the IBF interim Belt holder and Showtime recently turned the fight down anyways.

Ortiz is going the WBA ROUTE so who else you got on your list ???

[Oregonian]

Both fights are not what anybody wants. But at least Crawford still in the same weight class making fights . What the hell is error upto at 154 ????

He needs to drop those belts and vacate.

——-
Crawford is in the same weight class since 2017 fighting guys like Khan, Brook, Avanesyan and his next option will be Rocha.
Spence unified 3 belts at 147. Three belts vs one belt is a no brainer.

[Oregonian]

Seriously,
have you just crawled out from under a rock some place????

None of those other Fighters want any smoke , as the whole world can clearly see but you .

Error Sprintz Jr has done a runner upto 154, Boot's is the IBF interim Belt holder and Showtime recently turned the fight down anyways.

Ortiz is going the WBA ROUTE so who else you got on your list ???

——-
When you say “the whole world” you mean Crawford’s loyalists, right?
Spence not fighting Boots is just as fücked up as Crawford fighting Avanesyan.

There is no list. There’s only the top three guys at WW that Crawford AS A FREE AGENT should go after instead of cherry-picking easy fights.
Crawford needs to go after Boots, Ortiz or Spence since he plans to fight 3 times in 2023.

[ptek]

——-
When you say “the whole world” you mean Crawford’s loyalists, right?
Spence not fighting Boots is just as fücked up as Crawford fighting Avanesyan.

There is no list. There’s only the top three guys at WW that Crawford AS A FREE AGENT should go after instead of cherry-picking easy fights.
Crawford needs to go after Boots, Ortiz or Spence since he plans to fight 3 times in 2023.

The champion needs to go after ??????
that's not how it works and you know it. Challengers go after the champion. Not the other way round

[Oregonian]

The champion needs to go after ??????
that's not how it works and you know it. Challengers go after the champion. Not the other way round

———
Brook, Khan and Avanesyan “did not go after” the champion. They were all cherry-picked.
You can defend the Brook and Khan fight all you want, the bottom line remains they were in no position “to go after” Crawford. They were offered the fights.

[ptek]

———
Brook, Khan and Avanesyan “did not go after” the champion. They were all cherry-picked.
You can defend the Brook and Khan fight all you want, the bottom line remains they were in no position “to go after” Crawford. They were offered the fights.

Fighters fight who's in front of them . You can't make someone fight. Stop with all the bull,. You. & I both no Crawfords been either avoided or frozen out by the chumps over at the protective Boxing Custody company

[Oregonian]

Fighters fight who's in front of them . You can't make someone fight. Stop with all the bull,. You. & I both no Crawfords been either avoided or frozen out by the chumps over at the protective Boxing Custody company

——-
Your original argument has now changed. First it was, “Challengers go after the champion. Not the other way round”.
Now it’s “fighters fight who’s in front of them”. How many times are you going to shift goal posts?

Khan and Brook were NOT challengers.
And then you ignore what I said about Spence. Unlike you, I can criticize Spence.

All your responses about Spence is to deflect by going back to Spence or PBC.

There’s people who aren’t Spence nor Crawford fans. People that want to see legit matchups.
Quit defending your guy with your blind adulation

[peplz]

——-
Your original argument has now changed. First it was, “Challengers go after the champion. Not the other way round”.
Now it’s “fighters fight who’s in front of them”. How many times are you going to shift goal posts?

Khan and Brook were NOT challengers.
And then you ignore what I said about Spence. Unlike you, I can criticize Spence.

All your responses about Spence is to deflect by going back to Spence or PBC.

There’s people who aren’t Spence nor Crawford fans. People that want to see legit matchups.
Quit defending your guy with your blind adulation

First you were talking about sexual intercourse with farm animals and now you’re saying that Amir Khan and Kell Brook weren’t challengers when Terence Crawford defended his title against them. I’m not sure if your perverse allusions to bestiality or the reckless ignorance that you spew about the nature of the sport of boxing is worse. But its clear that you’re one of these people that makes it a point to try and muddy up the conversation with enough nonsense to make people lose interest in even talking about it anymore.

[Oregonian]

First you were talking about sexual intercourse with farm animals and now you’re saying that Amir Khan and Kell Brook weren’t challengers when Terence Crawford defended his title against them. I’m not sure if your perverse allusions to bestiality or the reckless ignorance that you spew about the nature of the sport of boxing is worse. But its clear that you’re one of these people that makes it a point to try and muddy up the conversation with enough nonsense to make people lose interest in even talking about it anymore.

———
You have me confused with someone else. I have no idea WTF you’re on about.
Unless that Ptek idiot is your cousin, I don’t know what to say to you.