Yahoo P4P Rankings?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KittenFlaps
    Punch Drunk
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2009
    • 1252
    • 59
    • 38
    • 7,414

    #11
    Originally posted by freeloada
    damn.. now im confused....
    I am confused and I wrote it.

    Entire point being that p4p rankings aren't really based on anything concrete. It's just someone's opinion on who the best fighters are. It's like making a list of the top 10 best pop songs of the last 20 years and not basing it on album sales.

    Comment

    • freeloada
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2009
      • 3135
      • 269
      • 163
      • 10,218

      #12
      Originally posted by KittenFlaps
      I am confused and I wrote it.

      Entire point being that p4p rankings aren't really based on anything concrete. It's just someone's opinion on who the best fighters are. It's like making a list of the top 10 best pop songs of the last 20 years and not basing it on album sales.
      That's understandable.. and i know that.. but they should truly be ashamed for putting this **** up in front of millions..

      Comment

      • KittenFlaps
        Punch Drunk
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2009
        • 1252
        • 59
        • 38
        • 7,414

        #13
        Originally posted by freeloada
        That's understandable.. and i know that.. but they should truly be ashamed for putting this **** up in front of millions..
        It's the internet. You and I are putting our thoughts in front of millions right now. The only difference is we aren't getting paid for it.

        Comment

        • freeloada
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2009
          • 3135
          • 269
          • 163
          • 10,218

          #14
          like this statement from the article..

          "And while it’s true that Marquez was a smaller man, size had little to do with the outcome of this fight."

          Are you ****ing serious? c'mon man.. Real boxing fans are not ******.
          If you believe that size had nothing to do with it then you're mistaking.
          I think he would have got dominated at 135 anyway againts may if they were in that division but at least it would have been more of a fight..

          Comment

          • KittenFlaps
            Punch Drunk
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • May 2009
            • 1252
            • 59
            • 38
            • 7,414

            #15
            Originally posted by freeloada
            like this statement from the article..

            "And while it’s true that Marquez was a smaller man, size had little to do with the outcome of this fight."

            Are you ****ing serious? c'mon man.. Real boxing fans are not ******.
            If you believe that size had nothing to do with it then you're mistaking.
            I think he would have got dominated at 135 anyway againts may if they were in that division but at least it would have been more of a fight..
            Agreed. That's an incredibly poorly written statement. While not altogether untrue (Mayweather probably would have beat Marquez at any weight) the weight issue is not irrelevant and overall says a lot about Mayweather.

            Comment

            • freeloada
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jun 2009
              • 3135
              • 269
              • 163
              • 10,218

              #16
              Originally posted by KittenFlaps
              Agreed. That's an incredibly poorly written statement. While not altogether untrue (Mayweather probably would have beat Marquez at any weight) the weight issue is not irrelevant and overall says a lot about Mayweather.
              good post homie! thanks..

              But its still bull****! haha

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP