Comments Thread For: Fury To Usyk: I'm Going To Bust You Up Real Bad You Little Middleweight!

[Boro]

I'm not trying to argue here but my point is it's more than enough to live on. It's way more than most people live comfortably on so wanting more can be considered greedy imo. Maybe you don't realise how much 100m is to the average person.

But in what world do people gain wealth and their lifestyle doesn't change with it? therefore expenditure increases and they need more money to maintain the lifestyle and also I mentioned generational wealth and if you really believe $100m gross is generational I have a bridge to sell you.

[GhostofDempsey]

I'll call it now...if Usyk pulls off an upset, everyone will be calling him the GOAT HW and Fury a hype job.

[Apollo7]

But in what world do people gain wealth and their lifestyle doesn't change with it? therefore expenditure increases and they need more money to maintain the lifestyle and also I mentioned generational wealth and if you really believe $100m gross is generational I have a bridge to sell you.

That's all still greed though imo. I don't blame anybody for it, I would probably do the same but wanting a certain overly affluent lifestyle and generational wealth is kind of greedy in my book.

[Boro]

That's all still greed though imo. I don't blame anybody for it, I would probably do the same but wanting a certain overly affluent lifestyle and generational wealth is kind of greedy in my book.

I'm confused providing for your family is greed? my mind is blown, it's your duty as a man to provide for your family and leave a legacy that can prosper for years to come greed doesn't come into it...

[Apollo7]

I'm confused providing for your family is greed? my mind is blown, it's your duty as a man to provide for your family and leave a legacy that can prosper for years to come greed doesn't come into it...

Well there's different levels of providing. Your family don't necessarily need Ferrari's. How are you defining greed?

[Murray Kelm]

100 million is generational wealth if you invest wisely and don't piss the money away, also shouldn't Fury's kids also provide a bit for themselves, they will have a much more fulfilling life if they do,instead of being a trustfund baby.

[Boro]

Well there's different levels of providing. Your family don't necessarily need Ferrari's. How are you defining greed?

I don't, I didn't initially mention greed i responded to someone else's mentioning of it, I think the premise of "greed" is a joke.

I've earned everything I've got and my family and the relevant people around me should benefit from it.

I assume the same holds true with Fury and nothing is stopping the next man from earning money, apart from their sheer laziness and unwillingness to do what is necessary to get to where they want to be in life.

As for your Ferrari comment, you're making assumptions about what people do with their money how do you know Fury and his children aren't philanthropic...

Not to say he/they are but it's a very real possibility and let's not pretend wealth/large amounts of money circulating doesn't create jobs, so the neanderthals benefit either way.

[Kzbox]

I don't, I didn't initially mention greed i responded to someone else's mentioning of it, I think the premise of "greed" is a joke.

I've earned everything I've got and my family and the relevant people around me should benefit from it.

I assume the same holds true with Fury and nothing is stopping the next man from earning money, apart from their sheer laziness and unwillingness to do what is necessary to get to where they want to be in life.

As for your Ferrari comment, you're making assumptions about what people do with their money how do you know Fury and his children aren't philanthropic...

Not to say he/they are but it's a very real possibility and let's not pretend wealth/large amounts of money circulating doesn't create jobs, so the neanderthals benefit either way.

Well that may all be true but the fact is he's exchanging money for his legacy so that's on him and we can't complain about people dismissing Fury as an ATG it will be through his own making. I personally believe he has enough at this point and his boxing legacy is more important if he really doesn't care then fair enough.

This is all what ifs anyway best to just see what happens.

[Boro]

Well that may all be true but the fact is he's exchanging money for his legacy so that's on him and we can't complain about people dismissing Fury as an ATG it will be through his own making. I personally believe he has enough at this point and his boxing legacy is more important if he really doesn't care then fair enough.

This is all what ifs anyway best to just see what happens.

Fury isn't an ATG, far from it he has one good win and what 3 defences, until he beats Usyk he can't even be considered the best of this era let alone an ATG.

[Kzbox]

Fury isn't an ATG, far from it he has one good win and what 3 defences, until he beats Usyk he can't even be considered the best of this era let alone an ATG.

Well that's exactly what i'm saying dude if he doesn't accept the 50% to fight Usyk for legacy than he's putting greed over legacy.

I think if he beats Usyk, Joyce and Joshua he can be an ATG.