Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Thurman Only Has 1 Loss To Pacquiao And Is Still A Better Win Than Anyone On Crawford's Resume

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Get em up View Post

    You wont see me on here anywhere justifying **** fights no mater who is the ring. I'm old school if the champions arent unifying then it should be next man up and I'm not talking name value I'm talking rankings legitimate rankings
    You pointed out better guys Spence can be fighting
    Having you ever made such a statement regarding Dud !?!?!?!?

    Comment


    • #62
      In the last 5 years he is 2-1, beating josito and barrios doesnt prove you as 3rd best in the division.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by elfag View Post
        In the last 5 years he is 2-1, beating josito and barrios doesnt prove you as 3rd best in the division.
        Sometime is at least a known name.

        Who was that guy who just fought Dud ?
        Who in the heck is Egidijus Kavaliauskas
        Dud fought the worst version of Porter
        The worst version of Brook
        HORN......

        Sometime would be Dud's best win right now.

        Comment


        • #64
          ''Crawford is a generational talent !!!!''

          !!!!

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by LeOoze View Post

            lol if thurman was washed then what was pacquiao?
            You saw the Ugas fight, that was Manny, Thurman was diminished a lot that's why Manny looked good, Ugas showed the true form.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post

              You pointed out better guys Spence can be fighting
              Having you ever made such a statement regarding Dud !?!?!?!?
              Your stuck on Crawford and Spence I'm talking about deserving challengers to fight for a title it's still 2 different conversations. You can insert and name you like in the champion category and I dont give a flying ****. Thurman doesnt deserve a shot the other 3 do.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Get em up View Post

                Your stuck on Crawford and Spence I'm talking about deserving challengers to fight for a title it's still 2 different conversations. You can insert and name you like in the champion category and I dont give a flying ****. Thurman doesnt deserve a shot the other 3 do.
                Crawford should get it but he had a mental break down in negotiations. Don't tell me anything about boots. Boots resume is complete trash and he looked like dog ish in his last fight. Ortiz yea maybe. Thurman in the middle of this is not that bad or un deserving.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post

                  maxresdefault.jpg

                  See, this is the perfect example of fans seeing shlt that never happened !!!!
                  lol, are you blind? He looked DONE after rd5. I'm not sure how he continued on from there. Then he almost folded in two from a body shot at the end of like rd 9 or 10. It was an annihilation when you consider the age difference and Keith looking in the best shape of his career. Don't be salty that the old man probably lost you a **** load of money on that fight. Puts into perspective how most this WW era SUCKS.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    People are sleeping on Thurman.

                    I do think Spence will win but it’s not going to be some cake walk.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Beercules View Post
                      People are sleeping on Thurman.

                      I do think Spence will win but it’s not going to be some cake walk.
                      Thurman has been continuously injured/inactive, and returned to fight a 140lber on a PPV. Why shouldn't he be slept on?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP