Originally posted by F l i c k e r
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Thurman Only Has 1 Loss To Pacquiao And Is Still A Better Win Than Anyone On Crawford's Resume
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post
Article dated December 2019.
He fought Porter in 2021, so like I told you: Porter was his last notable win.
I knew you were full of it.
Oops
Comment
-
Originally posted by Leicesterage View Post
So share a link where Crawford has said that Porter was his best win.
I'll wait
What makes this even funnier is you literally exposed your own lie by posting the link.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post
You lied and got caught, you fool. You tried to say Crawford hadn’t done anything in half a decade like Thurman. I told you that’s incorrect cause he beat Porter at the end of 2021. You then tried to say the Porter win isn’t relevant because Crawford said “his last notable win was Horn” which is complete bullsh**.
What makes this even funnier is you literally exposed your own lie by posting the link.
But that's cool, you can keep on calling Crawford a liar. He said he became #1 by beating Horn. If that's true, beating Porter did nothing for him. You can't go higher than #1.Last edited by Combat Talk Radio; 01-17-2023, 11:55 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Leicesterage View Post
No, the bottom line is, you're the only one rating the Porter win. Even Crawford doesn't rate that win over Horn.
But that's cool, you can keep on calling Crawford a liar. He said he became #1 by beating Horn. If that's true, beating Porter did nothing for him. You can't go higher than #1.
Porter was ranked #4 by Ring, #4 by TBRB and #3 by ESPN so regardless of what you think it was a good win. It also disproves your nonsense statement that Crawford hadn’t done anything in half a decade.
As I’ve told you multiple times, whichever way you wanna spin it, in 2023, Crawford is a far more credible opponent than Thurman.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post
No you got got lying you little weasel. Crawford never said he rated the Horn win above the Porter win.
He even said that Porter was just a roadblock thrown up by PBC.
So...you can keep ignoring what Crawford's telling you. You and people like you are the reason he ducked Spence, because you refuse to actually listen to what he's saying (and what he's NOT saying speaks volumes).
Bottom line: you are the only one who rates the Porter win for him. That's fine, but Porter had two bad hips and a triggered trainer. We didn't get a resolution.
Don't change the fact that Crawford ducked Spence to fight a soft touch with illegal used gloves, and was still getting touched up, ultimately resulting in a bare knuckle knockout of an innocent man.
Meanwhile, Spence looks like he's moving on, de facto top Welterweight.
Don't blame Spence or Keef. Blame Crawford for the ducking. Let him rob BLK Prime blind en route to a Broner fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Roadblock View Post
The winning form generally looks that way because it's comparing from winning to a comparison from losing across time frames, which is hard to do accurately without measuring, in racehorses they measure distance and time with a stop watch, with fighters you don't have any of that, its always an eye test and that can be distorted.
There is no doubt in my mind that the Thurman Manny beat is levels below the Thurman from 3 yrs earlier. it was an old version of Manny and he fought well to win in a very competitive fight, but it wasn't near the best Thurman. And in Errol's fight it will again be competitive because Thurman can fight, but Errol will break him down and run him over in the long haul.
I'm more inclined to believe that the Thurman that lost to Pac would beat the Ugas that beat Pac.
Comment
Comment