Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Thurman Only Has 1 Loss To Pacquiao And Is Still A Better Win Than Anyone On Crawford's Resume

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by F l i c k e r View Post

    Did the WBC order this fight for the WW title?
    I know they made Thurman mandatory, and it appears like they're giving Spence a pass for fighting him at 154...but IDK if Thurman will be parading the WBC 147lb title if he wins. How would the WBC justify that? This shxt has me so confused.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post

      Only one of them needed sunglasses after the fight !!!!!

      You're a typical blindly loyal fan boy
      Cong****
      Just because Queef had too much pride. That man should of took them off Pac's face and covered up! He was turned to beef chuck!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by F l i c k e r View Post

        Avan isn't an A class boxer. Probably not even a B.
        And Barrios is?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post

          That was before he fought Porter you f***ing moron

          Next time you lie, don’t expose yourself.
          So share a link where Crawford has said that Porter was his best win.

          I'll wait

          Comment


          • Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post



            Article dated December 2019.

            He fought Porter in 2021, so like I told you: Porter was his last notable win.

            I knew you were full of it.
            Besides this, if Crawford said he was ALREADY #1 after beating Jeff Horn, a Porter win wasn't going to change much.

            Oops

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Leicesterage View Post

              So share a link where Crawford has said that Porter was his best win.

              I'll wait
              You lied and got caught, you fool. You tried to say Crawford hadn’t done anything in half a decade like Thurman. I told you that’s incorrect cause he beat Porter at the end of 2021. You then tried to say the Porter win isn’t relevant because Crawford said “his last notable win was Horn” which is complete bullsh**.

              What makes this even funnier is you literally exposed your own lie by posting the link.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post

                You lied and got caught, you fool. You tried to say Crawford hadn’t done anything in half a decade like Thurman. I told you that’s incorrect cause he beat Porter at the end of 2021. You then tried to say the Porter win isn’t relevant because Crawford said “his last notable win was Horn” which is complete bullsh**.

                What makes this even funnier is you literally exposed your own lie by posting the link.
                No, the bottom line is, you're the only one rating the Porter win. Even Crawford doesn't rate that win over Horn.

                But that's cool, you can keep on calling Crawford a liar. He said he became #1 by beating Horn. If that's true, beating Porter did nothing for him. You can't go higher than #1.
                Last edited by Combat Talk Radio; 01-17-2023, 11:55 PM.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Leicesterage View Post

                  No, the bottom line is, you're the only one rating the Porter win. Even Crawford doesn't rate that win over Horn.

                  But that's cool, you can keep on calling Crawford a liar. He said he became #1 by beating Horn. If that's true, beating Porter did nothing for him. You can't go higher than #1.
                  No you got got lying you little weasel. Crawford never said he rated the Horn win above the Porter win. How could he in 2019? He hadn’t even fought Porter. You tried to manufacture a fake narrative and got exposed.

                  Porter was ranked #4 by Ring, #4 by TBRB and #3 by ESPN so regardless of what you think it was a good win. It also disproves your nonsense statement that Crawford hadn’t done anything in half a decade.

                  As I’ve told you multiple times, whichever way you wanna spin it, in 2023, Crawford is a far more credible opponent than Thurman.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post

                    No you got got lying you little weasel. Crawford never said he rated the Horn win above the Porter win.
                    The dude has never openly said that the Porter win was now his top. Do you know why? Because he still believes Horn is.

                    He even said that Porter was just a roadblock thrown up by PBC.

                    So...you can keep ignoring what Crawford's telling you. You and people like you are the reason he ducked Spence, because you refuse to actually listen to what he's saying (and what he's NOT saying speaks volumes).

                    Bottom line: you are the only one who rates the Porter win for him. That's fine, but Porter had two bad hips and a triggered trainer. We didn't get a resolution.

                    Don't change the fact that Crawford ducked Spence to fight a soft touch with illegal used gloves, and was still getting touched up, ultimately resulting in a bare knuckle knockout of an innocent man.

                    Meanwhile, Spence looks like he's moving on, de facto top Welterweight.

                    Don't blame Spence or Keef. Blame Crawford for the ducking. Let him rob BLK Prime blind en route to a Broner fight.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Roadblock View Post

                      The winning form generally looks that way because it's comparing from winning to a comparison from losing across time frames, which is hard to do accurately without measuring, in racehorses they measure distance and time with a stop watch, with fighters you don't have any of that, its always an eye test and that can be distorted.

                      There is no doubt in my mind that the Thurman Manny beat is levels below the Thurman from 3 yrs earlier. it was an old version of Manny and he fought well to win in a very competitive fight, but it wasn't near the best Thurman. And in Errol's fight it will again be competitive because Thurman can fight, but Errol will break him down and run him over in the long haul.
                      If the Thurman that Manny beat is levels below from 3 years earlier, than what is the Thurman that Spence is fighting? Thurman is coming off even more inactivity than when he fought Pac. Just give Pac his credit for beating Thurman lol.

                      I'm more inclined to believe that the Thurman that lost to Pac would beat the Ugas that beat Pac.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP