Comments Thread For: Stanionis Doesn't Believe It's Fair If Keith Thurman Is The Next Chosen Foe For Spence

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JLC
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2017
    • 1529
    • 510
    • 326
    • 30,573

    #61
    Originally posted by TheWinners

    Every fight is a big risk. It was a big risk for some guy named Karen to fight " Boots " and he did very well. This is like admitting these fighters cherry pick because they're afraid to risk losing.

    A lot of these fighters lose anyway because every fight is a risk. They end up losing to some guy they we're heavily favored to beat. Yet the presumed difficult fight was not worth the risk.

    I find it a lame excuse because the boxing greats always took risks. Every boxing troll on the internet says Mayweather cherry picked his whole career yet he's beat more legit champions than any of these new clown fighters. He fought Canelo when he was what 23? Mayweather was 36. Was that risky? He cherry picked though right?

    Canelo is running scared from Andrade right? Or no wait Jermall Charlo who won his belt beating 39 year old Bundrage. Yeah the best fighters just cherry pick the risky fights and want the easy payday. I highly doubt you internet trolls know the difference.

    The fraud fighters you have an emotional attachment to are robbing the fans who pay for the fights. And you'll defend them to the end.
    Floyd fought Canelo and how many PPV did that do ? Exactly. Canelo was worth the risk.

    RISK VS REWARD actually exists. Lol. I’m not telling you every fight that doesn’t get made is due to risk v reward, but it is a factor in the business of boxing. Don’t shoot the messenger.

    Comment

    Working...
    TOP