Floyd Stans rejoice...He is #1 P4P again....

[Al Haymon]

duh .... voidness have not fought paco yet ... and paco is going to fight a legit welter ... voidness did defeat a legit flyweight...i mean legit blown-up-flyweight-to-become-a-welter ..... LoL

[Doctor_Tenma]

I have different criteria for the P4P than I do for the weight rankings.

What is your criteria? Note: I want Mayweather to work his way up. I also want Mayweather as an under dog against Pacquiao, incase that goes down.

[Spear]

of course they will have floyd. its a american based list. paul williams being 3# will tell you everything.

[fightfan_79]

C'mon guys...the skills are undeniable...and as much as I hate to say it....P4P...Floyd should be at the top of everyone's list. It is not P4P most exciting fighter list....P4P is based on...well everyone knows what its based on....things are back to the way they were before he retired...Floyd at #1 and Manny in a close #2. Should be end of story......SHOULD BE....hehehehe

[RodBarker]

P4P is the biggest hype bull**** in boxing , its purely an opinion title thats given by voting not fought for , influenced as much by popularity as it is boxing , way too much emphasis is placed on it .

.

[Unbiased]

You might as well have gotten a P4P list from CNN with larry king. Find a credible source that actually knows something about boxing.

[MOREBASS]

Why do people take these lists so seriously?



Although I personally don't think beating a lightweight in a welterweight fight warrants an automatic jump back to the number one spot after two years away from the sport, it is what it is, and in the end these lists aren't worth a damn thing, except for a few hundred threads on Boxingscene.

[WhoreUs]

Anyway...................I think the Bears got a chance to get to the Super Bowl, what you guys think. Boxing is out of his league, let's c others sports.....

bears-raiders super bowl!!!!!!

[larry x]

yahoo p4p list doesnt mean ****

[fightfan_79]

So from what people are saying....Yahoo's P4P list.....which is almost identical to RING's...cept the fact that on RING's Floyd is #2......they are not credible anymore? The list doesn't mean anything? But yet when Pacquiao and Marquez were #1 and #2 it was a good gague of their toughness and greatness? I hate "Money" as much as the next guy....but c'mon....don't hate the "list" just because he's back on it....yeah....he fought a blown up lightweght....and dominated just like everyone though he would...I personally thought he would've KOd him by round 6.....but Floyd fits the "criteria" for being on the list. Can't deny that....hate it all we want...but can't deny it.