More bullshyt. A good standard would’ve been sticking with vada 24/7 instead of doing it for just 1 year for good press and then quietly discontinuing it. Knowing the exact time frame you’re being tested defeats the purpose and makes it easy for cheats such as Canelo to cycle on and off.
Comments Thread For: WBO Issues Medical Certification Letter To Jermell Charlo Requiring Explanation of Injury And Recovery
Collapse
-
-
I don’t think he is faking it, but the same people rallying behind him were insisting on x-rays and scans when PAC and Loma injured their shoulder. Even when PAC was diagnosed by a world renowned surgeon, they were still calling it fake. Even after his surgery they insisted he faked it. What goes around comes around.
Comment
-
That’s not exactly an apples to apples comparison. There’s a difference when you have to postpone a fight that hasn’t happened due to an injury, as opposed to claiming an injury only after you lose and it’s done so in a way to discredit the person who beat you. No boxers go into fights 100% healthy, so if you went into the fight willingly, it’s going to be perceived differently to then blame the loss on injury. Especially in the case of pac who then went on to say he didn’t get surgery because god and salt water healed him.
Comment
-
We all know Manny didn’t postpone the fight because it took him nearly six years to chase Floyd down for the fight. Backing out due to injury may have jeopardized the fight altogether. He did request a painkiller shot for his shoulder prior to the fight, which was denied. Oddly enough, Floyd was granted a TUE exception two weeks after being caught with an illegal IV. Manny’s injury was real, doesn’t matter if it was before or after the fight. Loma suffered a real shoulder injury as well. What proof did Hopkins offer when he claimed a severe shoulder injury in the Dawson fight? Some lackey doctor at a small clinic paid for by promoters and athletic commission? A sling and some Motrin. He claimed he was ready to spar just here months after an alleged separated shoulder.
Comment
-
More bullshyt. A good standard would’ve been sticking with vada 24/7 instead of doing it for just 1 year for good press and then quietly discontinuing it. Knowing the exact time frame you’re being tested defeats the purpose and makes it easy for cheats such as Canelo to cycle on and off.
You're back for more? Weirdo. You went off topic and only want to go back on topic when your hypocrisy was proven. Like I said, it’s your given right to be dumb, just don’t convince others that your ******ity is justified by using the logic of - if someone else does something dumb, the response to them should be to do something even dumber.
Did you ever go on a multiple post rant that Charlo shouldn't question Castano's injury? And that he was dumb for doing so? Naw, I'm sure you didn't.
You only seem concerned about stopping people from questioning Charlo's injury for some reason.Comment
-
Stay on topic. That other poster brought up Canelo so I'll address him about that, not you.
Of course I'm back for more. It's fun to mop the floor with your weak ass takes.
Did you ever go on a multiple post rant that Charlo shouldn't question Castano's injury? And that he was dumb for doing so? Naw, I'm sure you didn't.
You only seem concerned about stopping people from questioning Charlo's injury for some reason.
You literally can’t provide 1 valid reason to question his injury other than to basically admit you’re an emotional tw@t who doesn’t like him.
Comment
-
Yeah you just wanna deflect from the Canelo comments because it makes you look like a hypocrite. This isn’t a multiple post rant, it was a single post that you’ve responded to multiple times in an emotional way because I made you look like a dummy. Again your only logic is to counter a ****** action with an even more ****** action.
You literally can’t provide 1 valid reason to question his injury other than to basically admit you’re an emotional tw@t who doesn’t like him.
This thread isn't about Canelo. I'll only talk about that with the poster who brought him up.
The WBO thinks its valid to question Charlo's injury and to ask for medical proof. Do you think it's because they're emotional and because they don't like him? Ridiculous.
You just need to get it through your skull that other people are allowed to look at this situation through something other than the "don't be mean to Jermell" glasses that you wear.Comment
-
Stay. On. Topic.
This thread isn't about Canelo. I'll only talk about that with the poster who brought him up.
The WBO thinks its valid to question Charlo's injury and to ask for medical proof. Do you think it's because they're emotional and because they don't like him? Ridiculous.
You just need to get it through your skull that other people are allowed to look at this situation through something other than the "don't be mean to Jermell" glasses that you wear.
Comment
-
 people really going at it and going off topic
All charlo has to do is provide proof. That's it. If he doesn't then we'll know for sure he's fakingComment
-
You’re entire dislike of Charlo is based on your weird canelo love and you’ve admitted as much on here. The wbc is the sanctioning party and should require proof of their champion is asking to postpone a title fight. You’re a nobody on a website who has no reason to doubt his injury and your only reason to do so are your personal emotions, which you’ve admitted. Quite the female way to operate.
So the WBO questioned his injury. Is it because of personal emotions or weird Canelo love from the WBO? Is it because the WBO is dumb? According to you that must be it since those are the only possible reasons why anyone would dare to question Charlo.Comment
Comment