Pacquiao Vs Triple G

[IceTrayDaGang]

I can see it already. Pacquiao comes out of retirement to fight a has been punch bag with little movement.

Just saying...

I got Pacquiao on this one. Thought didn't occur to me until this morning and I thought this is so obviously the next thing.

yeah... why is a 44 year old pacquiao picking on a "has been punch bag" of triple G right??

[just the facts]

Pac can have 12 losses and be GOAT. Floyd can't be G oat. No GOATs are unbeaten.

For the record, Floyd is NOT the GOAT and neither is Pac. Floyd is ahead of Pac, both between 12 and 17 all time.

[lopetego]

Pacquiao won't fight above WW ever again, that fight with Margarito, in his own words, the ¨most painful fight¨ of his career, traumathized him

that's why he never tried for SWW again, Margo ended Pac's physical prime and had him aching on fetal position for 3 days

so Pacquiao won't move up, and GGG would die if he tried to come down anywhere close to WW

so pointless thread

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

You want a retired 44 year old who turned pro at Flyweight to come out of retirement to fight a Middleweight?

How about Mayweather vs Kovalev for the undercard?

[Ganondorf]

Can someone please show me a credible article dated in 2022 where number 48 Pacquiao has talked about fighting GGG?

Thanks.

[BodyBagz]

Probably the worst fantasy fight ever.
Why are fantasy fights not in the right section ?

[hugh grant]

For the record, Floyd is NOT the GOAT and neither is Pac. Floyd is ahead of Pac, both between 12 and 17 all time.

True, Floyd's not goat. But pac more fits the bill. Most goats have over 6 losses and try do things others havent. I mean Pac more entertaining idea of fighting Ggg than Floyd ever did. Even if Pac don't do it, he's eyeing it up, thinking about it, teasing idea.
Floyd just boasted he could beat ggg, but never giving impression he wanted it

[just the facts]

True, Floyd's not goat. But pac more fits the bill. Most goats have over 6 losses and try do things others havent. I mean Pac more entertaining idea of fighting Ggg than Floyd ever did. Even if Pac don't do it, he's eyeing it up, thinking about it, teasing idea.
Floyd just boasted he could beat ggg, but never giving impression he wanted it

This is some of the dumbest shyte I’ve ever read. Losses equates into greatness? Really dumb. Greatness measured by entertainment? Really dumb.

It’s obvious, Floyd EASILY beat you hero Pac and you ain’t over it yet.

[hugh grant]

This is some of the dumbest shyte I’ve ever read. Losses equates into greatness? Really dumb. Greatness measured by entertainment? Really dumb.

It’s obvious, Floyd EASILY beat you hero Pac and you ain’t over it yet.

All i m saying p ac s resume resemb les all those guys consider goat over 100 years of boxing more than floyd. Pac s got more in common to them than floyd does.
So you saying boxing historians are dumb?

[just the facts]

All i m saying p ac s resume resemb les all those guys consider goat over 100 years of boxing more than floyd. Pac s got more in common to them than floyd does.
So you saying boxing historians are dumb?

No, I’m saying you’re dumb. Vs his most significant opposition (Floyd and JMM), Pac is 2-2-1 with 1 lopsided loss, 1 out cold knockout loss, 2 razor thin decision wins and a draw. Vs his most significant opposition (Pac, Canelo, JMM), Floyd is 3-0 with 3 lopsided wins. None of the 3 were even very competitive. Add in the other quality opposition Floyd fought and that he retired undefeated, it’s a simple fact that Floyd will always be remembered as a superior fighter vs Pac.