Comments Thread For: Mayweather: More Power To Davis For Being His Own Boss - I Want To See Fighters Grow

[archiemoore1]

[QUOTE=Roadblock;n31687561]

As I said you are extreme going into imaginary places, there is nothing rational about you at all

ur like a dumb ass Trump supporter. No matter what the truth is, u will have an alternative logic. U win genius

[War Room]

Gervonta got Al too.

Not anymore he doesn't. Floyd said some things recently that makes me think this. Saying to the effect, if Tank isn't with him, Tank isn't with Al. When he made this comment, Tank wasn't mentioned I might add.

[Roadblock]

[QUOTE=archiemoore1;n31687739]

As I said you are extreme going into imaginary places, there is nothing rational about you at all

ur like a dumb ass Trump supporter. No matter what the truth is, u will have an alternative logic. U win genius

One only needs to look at our convo to see who the extremist is, you're a narcissistic hater and they are always weak-minded people its part of the requirement to be a hater, have a good read if you can stand it.


The fascinating thing, however, is not so much the root of why a hater hates but, rather, the psychological processes that more broadly undergird and propel the hating. There are a few cognitive biases that may be helpful in explaining the hater. No matter what they say, haters are not dispassionate and objective people when it comes to their hated object. In essence, they are emotionally motivated to hate. One cognitive bias, Motivated Reasoning, seems apropos here. It is an emotion-biased, decision-making phenomenon where decision-makers hold a preferred outcome with regard to an evaluative task. As such, they are inclined to arrive at a particular conclusion about the hated object by engaging in biased processes with regard to accessing, constructing and evaluating information.

In essence, the hater too easily embraces, or may affirmatively search for, negative information about the hated object even if that information is de minimus. They are susceptible to Confirmation Bias -- the tendency to search for, interpret, focus on and remember information in a way that confirms their own preconceptions. Not surprisingly, haters exhibit Attentional Bias, the tendency to have their perceptions of the hated object be affected by their recurring (negative) thoughts about that object. Similarly, there is a tendency for haters to engage in Selective Perception, where expectations about the hated object affect the hater's perception of information about said object. Therefore, it is inevitable that haters tend to be susceptible to the Focusing Effect, whereby they tend to place undue weight to certain aspects of events, namely those aspects that cast a negative light on the hated object.

Haters also strenuously resist positive information about the hated object no matter how overwhelming that information is. In part, they may be susceptible to Conservatism Bias in that they are unable to revise their beliefs sufficiently when presented with new evidence. Here, positive information about the hated object fails to alter the hater's evaluative needle of the hated object. This may be because of the Semmelweis Reflex or the tendency to reject new evidence that contradicts a paradigm. In fact, efforts to augment the judgments of the hated object by providing haters with disconfirming evidence may simply strengthen their beliefs, observed in the Backfire Effect.
These processes have nothing to do with how well-educated or intelligent the hater is or is not. Motivated reasoning is self-deceptive, irrational and lies outside of conscious awareness.

As psychologist Ziva Kunda noted:

People do not realize that the process is biased by their goals, that they are accessing only a subset of their relevant knowledge, that they would probably access different beliefs and rules in the presence of different directional goals and that they might even be capable of justifying opposite conclusions on different occasions.

In my experience, haters cannot be reasoned with; and, accordingly, that is why, as Taylor Swift notes in her song, Shake It Off, "And the haters gonna hate, hate, hate."

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-psychology-of-haters_b_7597400

[archiemoore1]

[QUOTE=Roadblock;n31687888]

One only needs to look at our convo to see who the extremist is, you're a narcissistic hater and they are always weak-minded people its part of the requirement to be a hater, have a good read if you can stand it.


The fascinating thing, however, is not so much the root of why a hater hates but, rather, the psychological processes that more broadly undergird and propel the hating. There are a few cognitive biases that may be helpful in explaining the hater. No matter what they say, haters are not dispassionate and objective people when it comes to their hated object. In essence, they are emotionally motivated to hate. One cognitive bias, Motivated Reasoning, seems apropos here. It is an emotion-biased, decision-making phenomenon where decision-makers hold a preferred outcome with regard to an evaluative task. As such, they are inclined to arrive at a particular conclusion about the hated object by engaging in biased processes with regard to accessing, constructing and evaluating information.

In essence, the hater too easily embraces, or may affirmatively search for, negative information about the hated object even if that information is de minimus. They are susceptible to Confirmation Bias -- the tendency to search for, interpret, focus on and remember information in a way that confirms their own preconceptions. Not surprisingly, haters exhibit Attentional Bias, the tendency to have their perceptions of the hated object be affected by their recurring (negative) thoughts about that object. Similarly, there is a tendency for haters to engage in Selective Perception, where expectations about the hated object affect the hater's perception of information about said object. Therefore, it is inevitable that haters tend to be susceptible to the Focusing Effect, whereby they tend to place undue weight to certain aspects of events, namely those aspects that cast a negative light on the hated object.

Haters also strenuously resist positive information about the hated object no matter how overwhelming that information is. In part, they may be susceptible to Conservatism Bias in that they are unable to revise their beliefs sufficiently when presented with new evidence. Here, positive information about the hated object fails to alter the hater's evaluative needle of the hated object. This may be because of the Semmelweis Reflex or the tendency to reject new evidence that contradicts a paradigm. In fact, efforts to augment the judgments of the hated object by providing haters with disconfirming evidence may simply strengthen their beliefs, observed in the Backfire Effect.
These processes have nothing to do with how well-educated or intelligent the hater is or is not. Motivated reasoning is self-deceptive, irrational and lies outside of conscious awareness.

As psychologist Ziva Kunda noted:

People do not realize that the process is biased by their goals, that they are accessing only a subset of their relevant knowledge, that they would probably access different beliefs and rules in the presence of different directional goals and that they might even be capable of justifying opposite conclusions on different occasions.

In my experience, haters cannot be reasoned with; and, accordingly, that is why, as Taylor Swift notes in her song, Shake It Off, "And the haters gonna hate, hate, hate."

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-psychology-of-haters_b_7597400

U said all that psycho babble, which u obviously quoted from some article, then ended with a Taylor Swift song. That's proof u give dudes head. Gtfoh

[Smash]

sorry floyd but tank letting u go wont allow him to grow any more, he will always be a little midget