Lawrence Okolie is actually ******

[Inspired]

Eddie's argument was that so far they'd lost money on Okolie and want to recoup some of that with a final fight that he's contractually obliged to.
To that, Okolie argued 'if i'm losing you money, why would you want me to lose you money again?'.

Does he not understand that they invested in his GROWTH and hence expected dividends in the future once he was finally in world title fights?


His next argument was he's a free agent and that he isn't ****** ie that he can see his own contract and knows that he's actually a free agent now. So why is he clinging onto eddie? if he's a free agent, he can sign with boxxer. He insisted that he has his own legal team who have confirmed he is free, but admitted that he wasn't involved in signing his previous contract (for his last fight). He wasn't awar eof any clause or extention.
So basically this stuff prompted him to refer to eddie as a slave owner from django in public. is it eddie's fault that he had nelson mandella, spencer fearon and malcolm x sign his contract for him?

He's now appealed to eddie by pointing out that Eddie left sky sports when he was offered $1b by dazn ie that it waso kay for eddie to show little loyalty , so why should he?
except the 1b deal was a US deal and sky sports were still the uk broadcaster until that contract actually expired.

[low blows]

Eddie's argument was that so far they'd lost money on Okolie and want to recoup some of that with a final fight that he's contractually obliged to.
To that, Okolie argued 'if i'm losing you money, why would you want me to lose you money again?'.

Does he not understand that they invested in his GROWTH and hence expected dividends in the future once he was finally in world title fights?


His next argument was he's a free agent and that he isn't ****** ie that he can see his own contract and knows that he's actually a free agent now. So why is he clinging onto eddie? if he's a free agent, he can sign with boxxer. He insisted that he has his own legal team who have confirmed he is free, but admitted that he wasn't involved in signing his previous contract (for his last fight). He wasn't awar eof any clause or extention.
So basically this stuff prompted him to refer to eddie as a slave owner from django in public. is it eddie's fault that he had nelson mandella, spencer fearon and malcolm x sign his contract for him?

He's now appealed to eddie by pointing out that Eddie left sky sports when he was offered $1b by dazn ie that it waso kay for eddie to show little loyalty , so why should he?
except the 1b deal was a US deal and sky sports were still the uk broadcaster until that contract actually expired.

Good old Lawrence was pushing brooms at McDonalds in central London until Joshua inspired him. I doubt he understands contract law he has people whispering in his ear and they are f ing up his mind.

Fight your last fight on the contract and win and reap the rewards. Going down this route will only cost him tens of thousands he will at the end of the day lose.

[Inspired]

Good old Lawrence was pushing brooms at McDonalds in central London until Joshua inspired him. I doubt he understands contract law he has people whispering in his ear and they are f ing up his mind.

Fight your last fight on the contract and win and reap the rewards. Going down this route will only cost him tens of thousands he will at the end of the day lose.

I think he's left 258 management and has new people around him. So basically 258 were in cahoots with matchroom and signed this contract for him, he didn't read it.
That's his own fault, not eddie's.
The truth is he thought character assasination would work, like it did for amanda serrano. That's fkin low of him.