Pacquiao could have easily fought Raheem instead of his fight with Larios, who had to move up two divisions. Or, he could have fought Raheem after he rematched Morales.
For the record, Raheem vs Freitas was a very close fight and I felt Raheem was a victim of corruption. Raheem losing a highly controversial split decision does not let Pacquiao off the hook. If fighting Larios, a guy who was brutally KO'd in just 3 rounds in his previous fight two divisions lower, was an ok fight for Team Pacquiao, then why not against the guy who swept every round against Morales?
Glad you get my point though!
For the record, Raheem vs Freitas was a very close fight and I felt Raheem was a victim of corruption. Raheem losing a highly controversial split decision does not let Pacquiao off the hook. If fighting Larios, a guy who was brutally KO'd in just 3 rounds in his previous fight two divisions lower, was an ok fight for Team Pacquiao, then why not against the guy who swept every round against Morales?
Glad you get my point though!
Comment