Cotto is by far the better fighter/Mad Props
Collapse
-
the reason why TS is saying this so he could make the cotto victory look great by hyping cotto up. win win situation, if pacquiao wins he beat a great fighter, if pacquiao loses he lost to a great fighter so what? ****riding at its best. and for the record although cotto is mentally damaged as seen by his fight against clottey, he took too much damage from margarito and they both took something out of each other, still cotto should crush pacquiao and i dont like cotto at all period, he just happens to be underestimated like hes nothing in this fight, everyone is talking about mayweather-pacquiao or mayweather-mosley, no one mentions mayweather-cotto which is a possibility when cotto crushes pacquiao with a bodyshot in the 6th.Comment
-
Well you you just had to go and make yourself look like a total idiot didnt you. There is always the Matlock ****er in a bunch. What sense does your ****** therory make... Way before this thread other fans of Cotto and I has PM'd each other in the past and they know what i really think....You dont because i dont normally spend time talking to idiots like youselfthe reason why TS is saying this so he could make the cotto victory look great by hyping cotto up. win win situation, if pacquiao wins he beat a great fighter, if pacquiao loses he lost to a great fighter so what? ****riding at its best. and for the record although cotto is mentally damaged as seen by his fight against clottey, he took too much damage from margarito and they both took something out of each other, still cotto should crush pacquiao and i dont like cotto at all period, he just happens to be underestimated like hes nothing in this fight, everyone is talking about mayweather-pacquiao or mayweather-mosley, no one mentions mayweather-cotto which is a possibility when cotto crushes pacquiao with a bodyshot in the 6th.
Comment
-
Main Entry: trans·par·ent
Pronunciation: \tran(t)s-ˈper-ənt\
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Medieval Latin transparent-, transparens, present participle of transparēre to show through, from Latin trans- + parēre to show oneself
Date: 15th century
1 a (1) : having the property of transmitting light without appreciable scattering so that bodies lying beyond are seen clearly : pellucid (2) : allowing the passage of a specified form of radiation (as X-rays or ultraviolet light) b : fine or sheer enough to be seen through : diaphanous
2 a : free from pretense or deceit : frank b : easily detected or seen through : obvious c : readily understood d : characterized by visibility or accessibility of information especially concerning business practicesComment
-
TS is good peeps, he speaks his mind. and he is agreeing with the majority of the people here in BS that cotto vs. pac is the best fight period.
I never discredit any boxer unless they pull some BS like mayweather or others. and I am glad to know that TS is giving cotto props. no matter what negative things people say about cotto you can't deny that he never is afraid to take on the best. he will never be criticized for that. Unlike other boxers.
Apology accepted!Comment
-
Cotto is a good fighter and you better give him his props cause he is Pacman's biggest test yet.
I have Cotto as the favorite on Nov 14. but i'll say this, if Pacman beats Cotto, much respect...and it will make a Mayweather - Pacman bout that much more to get excited about.Last edited by p4p-champ; 09-23-2009, 06:59 PM.Comment
-
thats the science tat needs to be dropped !!!!! good post man !TS is good peeps, he speaks his mind. and he is agreeing with the majority of the people here in BS that cotto vs. pac is the best fight period.
I never discredit any boxer unless they pull some BS like mayweather or others. and I am glad to know that TS is giving cotto props.. Unlike other boxers.no matter what negative things people say about cotto you can't deny that he never is afraid to take on the best. he will never be criticized for that
Apology accepted!Comment
-

Comment