Comments Thread For: Terence Crawford: "Jermell Charlo, He's Not On My Level Nor Errol Spence Level"

[Sid-Knee]

While you’re certainly entitled to your own opinion, you’re not entitled to your own facts. Martirosayan didn’t come anywhere close to beating Mell. I thought Mell deserved the decision vs Harrison in the 1st fight. Castano deserved the win in the first fight and it wasn’t close.

If any of these fighters were Brit, you’d be making post after post about how great they were. 1776 was a looooong time ago (who won that war anyway?). Get the phuck over it already.

You say i'm entitled to my own opinions, but not entitled to my own facts. Then go on and claim your opinion to be a fact? Yeah, it's not. Just your entitlement and arrogance.

Martirosayan didn't come close even though it was a close fight in which Martirosayan should have got it? You think it's a fact Charlo clearly won when that is factually not true?

Harrison won a close fight the first time too. It seems you don't like that though and think you can just present a narrative like most of you do to bend reality and facts to suit your ego's. Sorry, that isn't how the world works. It's how narcissists and nationalists work.

Name a single British fighter who has the same level of resume Charlo has that i have called great? Great is a word fit for the great's only, not the good and very good. I don't consider Taylor, AJ or Fury great. Yet, they're superior to your fighters' achievements. The only ones who call mediocre fighters great, are Americans and Mexicans. You've been here long enough to know that by now.

Who is talking about 1776? Maybe get some kind of self-awareness and grow up. Also read the context in which i made the original reply to further understand and not make a fool out of yourself like the rest do.

The British won the war as we were fighting against ourselves. Get an education while you're looking for that self-awareness.

[Sid-Knee]

Martirosayan? You must be one of those Crawford defenders posting that fiction. Also, Harrison and Castano were both brutally knocked out in the rematch. Charlo is getting in the ring with all the fighters that are ranked at the top taking the chances to be great, win or lose, as it should be, while Crawford fights Avanesyen instead of Spence. Keep dwelling in his glory of beating up mid-tier Mean Machines and Amir Khan, that's really reaching for greatness.

Who is defending Crawford? I'm just pointing out some home truths which you don't seem to like. But that's the problem isn't it. Anyone points out some home truths against your cult of PBC, you lash out like all brainwashed idiots do.

Yeah, Charlo sounded very brave when he tried to offload Crawford on Lubin and others like a chump. A real champion would welcome allcomers. That is not what Charlo did. He sounded more like his brother or Deontay Wilder.

[South Champion]

Crawford being undisputed at both 140 & 154 without being undisputed at 147?

Being undisputed in 2 different divisions is rare air to share, but has anyone been undisputed in a division, and then become undisputed in the division 2 weights above without being undisputed in the division in the middle? That would be quite the accomplishment, and quite the way to become a 4 division champ and a 2 time undisputed champ in the same fight.

[just the facts]

You say i'm entitled to my own opinions, but not entitled to my own facts. Then go on and claim your opinion to be a fact? Yeah, it's not. Just your entitlement and arrogance.

Martirosayan didn't come close even though it was a close fight in which Martirosayan should have got it? You think it's a fact Charlo clearly won when that is factually not true?

Harrison won a close fight the first time too. It seems you don't like that though and think you can just present a narrative like most of you do to bend reality and facts to suit your ego's. Sorry, that isn't how the world works. It's how narcissists and nationalists work.

Name a single British fighter who has the same level of resume Charlo has that i have called great? Great is a word fit for the great's only, not the good and very good. I don't consider Taylor, AJ or Fury great. Yet, they're superior to your fighters' achievements. The only ones who call mediocre fighters great, are Americans and Mexicans. You've been here long enough to know that by now.

Who is talking about 1776? Maybe get some kind of self-awareness and grow up. Also read the context in which i made the original reply to further understand and not make a fool out of yourself like the rest do.

The British won the war as we were fighting against ourselves. Get an education while you're looking for that self-awareness.

1776 was a loooooooong time ago, get the phuck over it already. Who won that war anyway?

[Sid-Knee]

1776 was a loooooooong time ago, get the phuck over it already. Who won that war anyway?

Oh, good one. You're not a moron in any way.

Would you care to stick to the topic, or are you going to play games like a child the way you all do?

It's Christmas soon. Hopefully your country asks Santa for a point in this world and a cure for your personality disorders.

[just the facts]

Oh, good one. You're not a moron in any way.

Would you care to stick to the topic, or are you going to play games like a child the way you all do?

It's Christmas soon. Hopefully your country asks Santa for a point in this world and a cure for your personality disorders.

Your anti American bu!!shyte is getting tired. If it weren’t for the USA, you’d be speaking German on this very day.

[Sid-Knee]

Your anti American bu!!shyte is getting tired. If it weren’t for the USA, you’d be speaking German on this very day.

The only reason you think truth and logic is anti -American, is due to you living a life of lies and delusion all the time.

Educate yourself on that war too. You know how bad the education levels in your country are. I can see it every day on here with the likes of you.

It's OK, you can run away from the topic. You're good at running away. Just look at your "Fighters" abilities in this field.

[just the facts]

The only reason you think truth and logic is anti -American, is due to you living a life of lies and delusion all the time.

Educate yourself on that war too. You know how bad the education levels in your country are. I can see it every day on here with the likes of you.

It's OK, you can run away from the topic. You're good at running away. Just look at your "Fighters" abilities in this field.

So you’re sayin the USA didn’t save you Brits in WWII? You need educated, douche bag.

1776 was a loooooong time ago, get the phuck over it already (who won that war anyway?).

[Rebelrbg]

If you are going to be a boxing fan these days, you have to have a pretty good imagination.

Carry on with your rebel self.

Yeah, just imagine, you're offered a fight for undisputed with the guy that holds 3 of the belts in the division. You will make your biggest purse ever, have your largest showing, and jump your legacy up to new heights, just imagine.....but you choose to to secretly negotiate a fight, while still in negotiations for undisputed, with a C-level fighter for a big payday instead. Yeah, just imagine.

[Rebelrbg]

Who is defending Crawford? I'm just pointing out some home truths which you don't seem to like. But that's the problem isn't it. Anyone points out some home truths against your cult of PBC, you lash out like all brainwashed idiots do.

Yeah, Charlo sounded very brave when he tried to offload Crawford on Lubin and others like a chump. A real champion would welcome allcomers. That is not what Charlo did. He sounded more like his brother or Deontay Wilder.

There's a difference between being brave and being a selfish idiot. If Charlo took the Crawford fight after Bud just ducked Spence and blocked his opportunity to be undisputed, he would be stabbing his friend, Errol, in the back. Why would he reward Crawford with a chance for undisputed in a different division and a huge payday after Bud just chose to double negotiate and fight Avanesyen instead of Spence? Use some logic instead of hate.