The Top 25 Featherweights of All-Time – Top Ten

[IMDAZED]

I felt like Azumah belonged rated more at 130 where he dominated for most of ten years...I acknowledged to someone else that may have been a mistake but his Feather body of work is actually fairly limited. Hamed isn't the issue; Nelson could have been in in place of guys like Moran or Jeffra though.

It's funny...one of the hardest core history guys I know (CBZ guy) thinks I shorted Naseem...others don't see him there. Argument worthy figure.

Fair points although I don't see why a fighter couldn't be rated in both if he deserved to be. Adds to their greatness, I think.

[crold1]

Fair points although I don't see why a fighter couldn't be rated in both if he deserved to be. Adds to their greatness, I think.

Agree and there are fighters who get both. I have no beef with anyone rating Nelson but I think it would be more on knowing who he was as a fighter more than what he did even relative to his time. In another era, like the one Chocolate fought in, he probably makes both lists easy.

[obie]

He accomplished more AT Featherweight. Part of that was by ducking Marquez but he beat a lot of quality guys at 26.

Is this the best at 126 only?

Is 122 not included?

Just curious, where you put Pac, Barrera, Morales and Mayweather on your list?

I wonder where is Pac on your all-time list now. since you compared him to armstrong a year ago.

It’s an unlikely scenario for Manny Pacquaio to win a Hatton fight but not entirely inconceivable. If the marginally possible became the recently occurred, it would be the sort of achievement that could become truly transcendent; this generation’s Henry Armstrong triple-crown

http://www.boxingscene.com/?m=show&id=11974