Floyd can't run from every punch. And you talk like this "43 yr. old 6 foot tall 170 lb target" is a amateur. Sure Bernard has had some poor performances, and age is starting to catch up to him, but this doesn't make Bernard a lesser threat in his division.
whatever.
the guy is 43 yrs. old and pavlik couldn't hit him. he's also a bigger target.
Has he ever fought anyone as big as Kelly Pavlik? You act like you know it all. So who has Floyd fought who is larger then him? Oscar de la hoya, height wise? I don't think Floyd has ever fought anyone over 5 foot 11. And he BARELY beat Oscar. If I was a judge, I would of given it to Oscar. Floyd made me yawn during that fight.
do your research
pavlik may be bigger, but he has 0 skills and couldnt keep up with the speed of a 43 year old. my main point tho is that pavlik couldnt find hopkins, how is he gonna find mayweather!
the guy is 43 yrs. old and pavlik couldn't hit him. he's also a bigger target.
pavlik can't hit floyd.
So basically, Pavlik is trash because he has 1 loss vs an ATG fighter. Pavlik is big, making him a bigger target. So if a fighter is bigger than their opponent, There is no advantage to the bigger man? And last but not least, Floyd is untouchable.
pavlik may be bigger, but he has 0 skills and couldnt keep up with the speed of a 43 year old. my main point tho is that pavlik couldnt find hopkins, how is he gonna find mayweather!
There is the age issue again. I am not even going to get into that anymore. Some fighters do well at old age, some make a complete drop straight to retirement. All I got to say, Everyone is different.
So basically, Pavlik is trash because he has 1 loss vs an ATG fighter. Pavlik is big, making him a bigger target. So if a fighter is bigger than their opponent, There is no advantage to the bigger man? And last but not least, Floyd is untouchable.
Either your full of it, or I know nothing.
did i say he was trash?
dude , stfu.
don't put words in other people's mouth just because they don't agree with you.
when i picture this fight , i see pavlik having a hard time hitting floyd cleanly.
better , faster , greater fighters have had a hard time hitting floyd and they had size advantages as well.
pavlik can bother floyd with his size and reach but floyd would still be able to do enough to win some rounds.
there will be some scary moments for floyd when he gets cornered but in the end i can see floyd still winning a decision.
"The hate for Money is ridiculous! Now y'all want him to fight a MW? He'd school Pavlik, then y'all would say Pavlik was one dimensional. Just admit it; y'all hate Money and will never give him credit for anything! Y'all some haters! Money is the best!"
There is the age issue again. I am not even going to get into that anymore. Some fighters do well at old age, some make a complete drop straight to retirement. All I got to say, Everyone is different.
yeah, but did you see the bit where i put my main point is that pavlik couldnt find hopkins, so how is he gonna find mayweather?
don't put words in other people's mouth just because they don't agree with you.
when i picture this fight , i see pavlik having a hard time hitting floyd cleanly.
better , faster , greater fighters have had a hard time hitting floyd and they had size advantages as well.
pavlik can bother floyd with his size and reach but floyd would still be able to do enough to win some rounds.
there will be some scary moments for floyd when he gets cornered but in the end i can see floyd still winning a decision.
now stfu or at least talk to someone else.
Twice you have brought up the fact that he lost to Bhop. Bhop is old, blah blah blah. It's annoying because you sound like a broken record. Quit bringing up the same bs. Sure everyone has a different opinion, but just because Pavlik got beat by an older fighter, doesn't make him slow or incapable of hitting Floyd.
Comment