Could Mayweather beat Pavlik

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TheGreatA
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 14143
    • 633
    • 271
    • 21,863

    #21
    6'3, 170+ lbs might be too much for Mayweather but you never know. I certainly wouldn't count Mayweather out despite a size disadvantage.

    I also wouldn't say that it would be "easy".

    Comment

    • Benncollinsaad
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2009
      • 4210
      • 98
      • 40
      • 4,773

      #22
      Hey, this isnt WWE, Pavlik is not gonna kneel down and let Floyd punch him in the nose!

      Comment

      • WhoreUs
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2008
        • 15770
        • 556
        • 606
        • 20,363

        #23
        Originally posted by terrio
        Floyd can't run from every punch. And you talk like this "43 yr. old 6 foot tall 170 lb target" is a amateur. Sure Bernard has had some poor performances, and age is starting to catch up to him, but this doesn't make Bernard a lesser threat in his division.
        whatever.

        the guy is 43 yrs. old and pavlik couldn't hit him. he's also a bigger target.

        pavlik can't hit floyd.

        Comment

        • shade darkar
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2009
          • 6460
          • 227
          • 337
          • 12,996

          #24
          Originally posted by terrio
          Has he ever fought anyone as big as Kelly Pavlik? You act like you know it all. So who has Floyd fought who is larger then him? Oscar de la hoya, height wise? I don't think Floyd has ever fought anyone over 5 foot 11. And he BARELY beat Oscar. If I was a judge, I would of given it to Oscar. Floyd made me yawn during that fight.

          do your research
          pavlik may be bigger, but he has 0 skills and couldnt keep up with the speed of a 43 year old. my main point tho is that pavlik couldnt find hopkins, how is he gonna find mayweather!

          Comment

          • one-Punch
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2005
            • 3130
            • 221
            • 224
            • 9,866

            #25
            Originally posted by Mr._Pink
            whatever.

            the guy is 43 yrs. old and pavlik couldn't hit him. he's also a bigger target.

            pavlik can't hit floyd.
            So basically, Pavlik is trash because he has 1 loss vs an ATG fighter. Pavlik is big, making him a bigger target. So if a fighter is bigger than their opponent, There is no advantage to the bigger man? And last but not least, Floyd is untouchable.

            Either your full of it, or I know nothing.

            Comment

            • one-Punch
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2005
              • 3130
              • 221
              • 224
              • 9,866

              #26
              Originally posted by shade darkar
              pavlik may be bigger, but he has 0 skills and couldnt keep up with the speed of a 43 year old. my main point tho is that pavlik couldnt find hopkins, how is he gonna find mayweather!
              There is the age issue again. I am not even going to get into that anymore. Some fighters do well at old age, some make a complete drop straight to retirement. All I got to say, Everyone is different.

              Comment

              • WhoreUs
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Oct 2008
                • 15770
                • 556
                • 606
                • 20,363

                #27
                Originally posted by terrio
                So basically, Pavlik is trash because he has 1 loss vs an ATG fighter. Pavlik is big, making him a bigger target. So if a fighter is bigger than their opponent, There is no advantage to the bigger man? And last but not least, Floyd is untouchable.

                Either your full of it, or I know nothing.
                did i say he was trash?

                dude , stfu.

                don't put words in other people's mouth just because they don't agree with you.

                when i picture this fight , i see pavlik having a hard time hitting floyd cleanly.

                better , faster , greater fighters have had a hard time hitting floyd and they had size advantages as well.

                pavlik can bother floyd with his size and reach but floyd would still be able to do enough to win some rounds.

                there will be some scary moments for floyd when he gets cornered but in the end i can see floyd still winning a decision.

                now stfu or at least talk to someone else.

                Comment

                • MANGLER
                  Sex Tape Flop Artist
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 30142
                  • 1,705
                  • 2,355
                  • 46,598

                  #28
                  "The hate for Money is ridiculous! Now y'all want him to fight a MW? He'd school Pavlik, then y'all would say Pavlik was one dimensional. Just admit it; y'all hate Money and will never give him credit for anything! Y'all some haters! Money is the best!"

                  Comment

                  • shade darkar
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 6460
                    • 227
                    • 337
                    • 12,996

                    #29
                    Originally posted by terrio
                    There is the age issue again. I am not even going to get into that anymore. Some fighters do well at old age, some make a complete drop straight to retirement. All I got to say, Everyone is different.
                    yeah, but did you see the bit where i put my main point is that pavlik couldnt find hopkins, so how is he gonna find mayweather?

                    Comment

                    • one-Punch
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Apr 2005
                      • 3130
                      • 221
                      • 224
                      • 9,866

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Mr._Pink
                      did i say he was trash?

                      dude , stfu.

                      don't put words in other people's mouth just because they don't agree with you.

                      when i picture this fight , i see pavlik having a hard time hitting floyd cleanly.

                      better , faster , greater fighters have had a hard time hitting floyd and they had size advantages as well.

                      pavlik can bother floyd with his size and reach but floyd would still be able to do enough to win some rounds.

                      there will be some scary moments for floyd when he gets cornered but in the end i can see floyd still winning a decision.

                      now stfu or at least talk to someone else.
                      Twice you have brought up the fact that he lost to Bhop. Bhop is old, blah blah blah. It's annoying because you sound like a broken record. Quit bringing up the same bs. Sure everyone has a different opinion, but just because Pavlik got beat by an older fighter, doesn't make him slow or incapable of hitting Floyd.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP