Comments Thread For: Stevenson Expects Lomachenko To Go 'Haney Route': He Wants Titles

[Cypocryphy]

Yes you did. Then you reappeared with the draw garbage.

He lost. Just accept it.

I'm not sure what you are talking about. There is a life outside Boxingscene. I'll disappear for weeks at at time at most, but that's hardly disappearing.

Anyway, he didn't lose. Everyone who's a real boxing fan and aficionado knows this, so I'm not surprised that you don't.

[The Big Dunn]

I'm not sure what you are talking about. There is a life outside Boxingscene. I'll disappear for weeks at at time at most, but that's hardly disappearing.

Anyway, he didn't lose. Everyone who's a real boxing fan and aficionado knows this, so I'm not surprised that you don't.

When you disappear when you’re favorite boxer loses, having been extremely vocal prior to the fight, its cowardly.

Of course he did. The overwhelming majority of media experts, boxers and fans felt Loma lost.

You are the equivalent of a flat earther claiming those that disagree with you don’t know science or aren’t real geologists.

Doing this makes you look weak for not admitting he lost and exposes your bias, lack of credibility and integrity.

Real fans and aficionados don’t behave like that.

[War Room]

GOD DAMN!! I really got under your skin, exposing your dumb ass for not knowing **** about boxing. Sucks to be so insecure, doesn't it? And I am the Lomasexual of all lomasexuals, fyi The GREATEST

What's interesting, however, is your quote. You blurred out everything else, and that was by no accident. But why? I know the reason why. It was due to my using your own words, your own term. You didn't want anyone to see that you first used the word.



But now you have taken it in another direction, and I have to wonder why you have "sucking ****" on the mind WarRoom. A curious thing, to be honest. In fact, you're whole response to me is an allusion to ****sexuality and sucking ****. Are you knocking hard on that closet door, my guy? (Speaking of which, no more private messages please. )

BTW: I'll be around to keep reminding you that YDKSAB :*******:

So it took you almost 2 weeks to think of this ?

Nobody gets under my skin, I'm a fight fan, through and through. I love winning and that's what I've done with you; win, and rather easily I might add.

I blurred out everything else because I wanted to focus on your own comment that I've used against you. I normally add a layer in Photoshop and highlight in red with 50% opacity, but I'm mixing it up. Not the first time, you can see this methodology in the dome. Anyway, somehow you're reading into this far more than it was intended. Additionally, you're trying to steal my methods and use my work against me, which is impossible because I think several steps ahead.

I said fluffed up; like spruced up, but you're the one who said fluffer so let's keep it real that it's you that has dicksucking on his mind.

My guy? More stolen thunder, I am flattered. You're like my little wannabe clone, almost like a son that's imitating his father. How cute!

YDKSAB youngn' and by the looks of it, you never will. Stay mad kid!

[buddyr]

Honestly I think Haney Loma is next if both guys win, without too much drama (contracts, arena, etc).

Who wins? I think Loma. But will have a more informed opinion after Oct 29.

no 35 year old light weight is going to beat haney. After he beats Lomachenko's azz, you same guys will make the excuse that he's "old" or claim he won 8 rounds out of 12 in rounds he's clearly not landing anything. It's the normal routine on this site.

[buddyr]

When did I ever hide? I can't recall ... and Lopez didn't beat him. My card looked like Ward's card. Andre Ward nor myself saw Lopez beating Loma. You can't just march forward all fight long and think you can win it. That's all Lopez did. Loma clearly won round 2 and the took round seven through 11, easily. Round 12 was a swing round. Loma was setup to lose to Lopez. How else can you explain the judge's scorecards? What's her name gave Loma one round in the whole fight!! Clearly a setup. Same thing they did to Pacquiao when he fought Bradley. It's Top Rank's MO.

A lot of guys get wins based on politics and not skill. You know this very well Dunn.

Anyway, I have Haney losing to Loma so long as he hasn't aged too much. I could change my mind based on his performance against Ortiz. We'll see. But a Commey-esque performance will mean that Haney doesn't have a chance.

On the other side, I have Haney beating Shakur. Haney just has more tools in his belt. I think he hits harder than Shakur, and I think the size difference will give Shakur too many additional problems. I saw some good things from Haney last time out (aside from the excessive clinching, which I hate).

please don't use Andrea Ward as a voice of reason for anything concerning Top Rank.

[IAMTHAT]

no 35 year old light weight is going to beat haney. After he beats Lomachenko's azz, you same guys will make the excuse that he's "old" or claim he won 8 rounds out of 12 in rounds he's clearly not landing anything. It's the normal routine on this site.

I got Haney winning I would say now