Comments Thread For: Claressa Shields-Savannah Marshall Sanctioned By WBC For 'Elizabethan Belt'

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Claressa Shields-Savannah Marshall Sanctioned By WBC For 'Elizabethan Belt'

    Claressa Shields and Savannah Marshall have an added incentive to be victorious in their upcoming fight on Saturday, 15th October, with the winner to be handed the new WBC 'Elizabethan Belt'.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • DClefthook
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2019
    • 4592
    • 2,998
    • 1,533
    • 5,849

    #2
    so is this more relevant than the franchise belt?

    Comment

    • REMOVE SHARK 5510
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2022
      • 1151
      • 1,250
      • 1,566
      • 0

      #3
      This shi t is getting out of hands

      Comment

      • uncle_ray
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Feb 2010
        • 600
        • 31
        • 2
        • 14,547

        #4
        I hope Shields throws the belt out of the ring like AJ did

        Comment

        • The Devil Knows Boxing
          Banned
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Sep 2022
          • 471
          • 154
          • 117
          • 0

          #5
          these belts mean less and less every day. I don't think anyone realizes how close we are to 1st and 2nd place belts in fights. Whoever loses will still get a belt. It's a slap in the face to real champions in history.​​​

          Comment

          • Shadoww702
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2015
            • 41176
            • 4,546
            • 2,938
            • 250,035

            #6
            Larry and Rockin should fight for the belt!!!!

            Comment

            • Kannabis Kid
              BlackRobb's Step-Dad
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2009
              • 6202
              • 811
              • 620
              • 40,319

              #7
              These belts are just trophies for the winners it's not an actual title and holds no merit. Looks cool just like the ones Canelo gets and the one Fury got, not like they are going to defend it.

              Comment

              • Monty Fisto
                And still...
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2018
                • 3485
                • 1,497
                • 856
                • 22,690

                #8
                It'a trinket. Nothing more, nothing less.

                As the official mourning period for QEII had a genuine and material effect on both fighters, it is actually somehow apt to have a commemorative trinket. Not important, not a real belt per se, but less offensive than some of the other nonsense the WBC has come up with in the past.

                Comment

                • STREET CLEANER
                  The Watcher
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 19621
                  • 4,823
                  • 4,407
                  • 298,225

                  #9
                  The WBC just keeps making meaningless belts. I wonder if there is a sanctioning fee attached to it.

                  Comment

                  • visionary247
                    Contender
                    • May 2011
                    • 163
                    • 26
                    • 7
                    • 6,206

                    #10
                    If they had thought of it earlier it could've saved the card

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP