Scoring Eubank-Watson I

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • coghaugen
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2008
    • 1177
    • 49
    • 1
    • 19,104

    #1

    Scoring Eubank-Watson I

    I have to say Eubank's defensive radar in this fight is highly impressive -- he got Watson to miss so many punches by barely moving!-Particularly round 7. Other times he got Watson to miss by swaying his whole body. Watson was just puzzled.

    When Eubank got tired, he was ducking after throwing to make himself a small target. His work in round 10 is very, very clever - simply not getting hit and landed shots with a loose approach. So efficient.

    Round 1 - Eubank. Didn't take a punch. Both men trying to find range.

    Round 2 - Eubank. Got through with nice shots.

    Round 3 - Even. Great left hook counter by Eubank. Great overarm right by Watson. Otherwise chess-like.

    Round 4 - Even. Great left hooks landed by both. Otherwise chess-like.

    Round 5 - Eubank. Great sneaky right hand landed (and three-punch follow-up) the difference.

    Round 6 - Watson. Landed cleaner harder shots.

    Round 7 - Even.

    Round 8 - Watson. Landed cleaner harder shots.

    Round 9 - Eubank. Forced Watson back when he chose.

    Round 10 - Eubank.

    Round 11 - Eubank. Workrate.

    Round 12 - Watson. Landed some clean shots.


    What Eubank lacked in technique and stamina, he made up for by being one of the smartest, most efficient fighters ever seen.

    Hardly anyone can stand still in front of the opponent and counter like Eubank did without getting nailed. It takes tremendous reflexes.

    I think Eubank's reflexes had waned by the time of the Benn II fight, and he was then there for the taking (until Collins did take him). But what a great boxer to watch in his prime!

    Some of those rounds could go to Watson, it's subjective, because he was throwing. But really Eubank was riding so many shots on close inspection.

    Watson's jab was made ineffective through Eubank regularly being just out of range. So Watson just took everything Eubank had to give and then countered. Nobody did this to a prime Eubank. Apart from maybe Steve Collins, but Eubank wasn't in his prime in my opinion and should have got that decision.

    But this a 'robbery'? Utter nonsense.

    My subjective scorecard reads 117-114 in favour of Chris Eubank!
  • Benncollinsaad
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 4210
    • 98
    • 40
    • 4,773

    #2
    Originally posted by coghaugen
    I have to say Eubank's defensive radar in this fight is highly impressive -- he got Watson to miss so many punches by barely moving!-Particularly round 7. Other times he got Watson to miss by swaying his whole body. Watson was just puzzled.

    When Eubank got tired, he was ducking after throwing to make himself a small target. His work in round 10 is very, very clever - simply not getting hit and landed shots with a loose approach. So efficient.

    Round 1 - Eubank. Didn't take a punch. Both men trying to find range.

    Round 2 - Eubank. Got through with nice shots.

    Round 3 - Even. Great left hook counter by Eubank. Great overarm right by Watson. Otherwise chess-like.

    Round 4 - Even. Great left hooks landed by both. Otherwise chess-like.

    Round 5 - Eubank. Great sneaky right hand landed (and three-punch follow-up) the difference.

    Round 6 - Watson. Landed cleaner harder shots.

    Round 7 - Even.

    Round 8 - Watson. Landed cleaner harder shots.

    Round 9 - Eubank. Forced Watson back when he chose.

    Round 10 - Eubank.

    Round 11 - Eubank. Workrate.

    Round 12 - Watson. Landed some clean shots.


    What Eubank lacked in technique and stamina, he made up for by being one of the smartest, most efficient fighters ever seen.

    Hardly anyone can stand still in front of the opponent and counter like Eubank did without getting nailed. It takes tremendous reflexes.

    I think Eubank's reflexes had waned by the time of the Benn II fight, and he was then there for the taking (until Collins did take him). But what a great boxer to watch in his prime!

    Some of those rounds could go to Watson, it's subjective, because he was throwing. But really Eubank was riding so many shots on close inspection.

    Watson's jab was made ineffective through Eubank regularly being just out of range. So Watson just took everything Eubank had to give and then countered. Nobody did this to a prime Eubank. Apart from maybe Steve Collins, but Eubank wasn't in his prime in my opinion and should have got that decision.

    But this a 'robbery'? Utter nonsense.

    My subjective scorecard reads 117-114 in favour of Chris Eubank!
    Guys as ****** and blind as you should be refused membership here.

    Comment

    • coghaugen
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2008
      • 1177
      • 49
      • 1
      • 19,104

      #3
      I have 19/20 vision and an IQ of 138. I've been watching boxing since 1981.

      Comment

      • Benncollinsaad
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2009
        • 4210
        • 98
        • 40
        • 4,773

        #4
        Originally posted by coghaugen
        I have 19/20 vision and an IQ of 138. I've been watching boxing since 1981.
        Lol, I meant "blind" as in uncapable to look and judge the fight impartically. Dude, you ARE blind if you don't see Watson took the first three rounds at least! It's SO clear for everyone to see!

        Comment

        • coghaugen
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Sep 2008
          • 1177
          • 49
          • 1
          • 19,104

          #5


          The young Eubank before all the weight troubles, tragedies and controversies, was marvellous.

          Comment

          • Benncollinsaad
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2009
            • 4210
            • 98
            • 40
            • 4,773

            #6
            Originally posted by coghaugen


            The young Eubank before all the weight troubles, tragedies and controversies, was marvellous.
            Sure. No disagreeing with you there. Splendid physique, great reflexes, nice power, awesome chin...and great stamina.

            Comment

            • Dynamite Kid
              Slicker than your average
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2007
              • 20701
              • 627
              • 209
              • 38,291

              #7
              Originally posted by coghaugen
              I have to say Eubank's defensive radar in this fight is highly impressive -- he got Watson to miss so many punches by barely moving!-Particularly round 7. Other times he got Watson to miss by swaying his whole body. Watson was just puzzled.

              When Eubank got tired, he was ducking after throwing to make himself a small target. His work in round 10 is very, very clever - simply not getting hit and landed shots with a loose approach. So efficient.

              Round 1 - Eubank. Didn't take a punch. Both men trying to find range.

              Round 2 - Eubank. Got through with nice shots.

              Round 3 - Even. Great left hook counter by Eubank. Great overarm right by Watson. Otherwise chess-like.

              Round 4 - Even. Great left hooks landed by both. Otherwise chess-like.

              Round 5 - Eubank. Great sneaky right hand landed (and three-punch follow-up) the difference.

              Round 6 - Watson. Landed cleaner harder shots.

              Round 7 - Even.

              Round 8 - Watson. Landed cleaner harder shots.

              Round 9 - Eubank. Forced Watson back when he chose.

              Round 10 - Eubank.

              Round 11 - Eubank. Workrate.

              Round 12 - Watson. Landed some clean shots.


              What Eubank lacked in technique and stamina, he made up for by being one of the smartest, most efficient fighters ever seen.

              Hardly anyone can stand still in front of the opponent and counter like Eubank did without getting nailed. It takes tremendous reflexes.

              I think Eubank's reflexes had waned by the time of the Benn II fight, and he was then there for the taking (until Collins did take him). But what a great boxer to watch in his prime!

              Some of those rounds could go to Watson, it's subjective, because he was throwing. But really Eubank was riding so many shots on close inspection.

              Watson's jab was made ineffective through Eubank regularly being just out of range. So Watson just took everything Eubank had to give and then countered. Nobody did this to a prime Eubank. Apart from maybe Steve Collins, but Eubank wasn't in his prime in my opinion and should have got that decision.

              But this a 'robbery'? Utter nonsense.

              My subjective scorecard reads 117-114 in favour of Chris Eubank!


              However called this a robbery is a media whore without their own opinion who recites what others think, namely the commentators who had an agenda against Eubank, its quite clear that Eubank won 5 rounds of that fight at the very least so how on earth was Michael Watson a clear winner ?

              Bottom line is Eubank did not lose even if you think Watson did not lose

              Comment

              • Dynamite Kid
                Slicker than your average
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2007
                • 20701
                • 627
                • 209
                • 38,291

                #8
                By the way TS you have too many even rounds. In future try to find a winner for all the rounds, or most of them because it will obscure your scoring otherwise.

                Comment

                • Benncollinsaad
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 4210
                  • 98
                  • 40
                  • 4,773

                  #9
                  This fight WAS tightly contested, but Watson deserved the decision because he outsmarted Eubank and won more rounds. I have it 7-5 for Watson really. Or 7-4-1.

                  Comment

                  • coghaugen
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 1177
                    • 49
                    • 1
                    • 19,104

                    #10
                    Shame the ring entrances aren't up as Eubank's was God-like for this one...












                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP