If Eubank Jr loses this he'll be an even bigger laughing stock.
Comments Thread For: Benn to Eubank: You Underachieved; What Have You Actually Done at the Age of 33?
Collapse
-
Lol benn cant talk much about underachieving but hes spot on eubank losing his penn when being offered GGG fight. Complete Duck and losing to Benn would be catastrophic for him.whole pressure on him alrite.Comment
-
How is that a fair comparison? Benn is 25! His wins are already as good as Eubank's and Eubank is in his 30s. Stop talking nonsense. Benn has much more time to achieve more. Eubank is nearing his decline from his prime years. Try having a fair equivalency next time.What exactly have you done Conor? You haven’t even won a legitimate title. World? No. European? No. Commonwealth? No. British? No. English? No. Southern Area? No.
No fan of Eubank but this is definitely the pot calling the kettle black. The best accolade either of you have is the name you were born with.Comment
-
-
Well yeah. But he means resume and titles wise. He has a thin resume and has never held a major title. With boxing have 137 major titles in 17 weight classes, any decent fighter with some hype can win a title. At least short-lived. At least vacant vs a no-hoper.Comment
-
I’m not comparing him to Eubank. I’m saying he’s a hypocrite cause he hasn’t accomplished f*** all either.
Benn has had a completely manufactured career thus far. At least Eubank actually got in there with Saunders, Blackwell etc instead of ducking and dodging domestic rivals. Neither have done anything all that notable though. If their second names were Smith they’d be irrelevant.
Try actually comprehending the point next time.Comment
-
Yes I think there was no shame in him losing to BJS (Eubank almost came back and won in that fight and BJS refused to fight him again) and Groves (great learning fight for Eubank) but he just didn't do anything after he beat DeGale. That should have been the start of him pushing his career to new heights
I really agree with you there, he isn't mentioned in anything at SM or MW...I didnt know he was 33....against Groves he looked like he had forgotten to learn to box and George isnt Canelo...I am also disappointed in his career, against Yildrim, who admittedly isnt great either, he was great.
Win or lose against Benn, I wouldnt get your hopes up.Comment
-
How is he a hypocrite when he's nowhere near the age of Eubank? Why should he have accomplished as much as Eubank when he's much younger than him and hasn't been a pro nearly as long? That's my point. Apparently you didn't comprehend that very well but then again, I don't think we would see eye to eye about much. I disagree with the bulk of your posts anyways.
I’m not comparing him to Eubank. I’m saying he’s a hypocrite cause he hasn’t accomplished f*** all either.
Benn has had a completely manufactured career thus far. At least Eubank actually got in there with Saunders, Blackwell etc instead of ducking and dodging domestic rivals. Neither have done anything all that notable though. If their second names were Smith they’d be irrelevant.
Try actually comprehending the point next time.Comment
-
He’s been a pro for 6 and a half years and hasn’t won one legitimate title.
How is he a hypocrite when he's nowhere near the age of Eubank? Why should he have accomplished as much as Eubank when he's much younger than him and hasn't been a pro nearly as long? That's my point. Apparently you didn't comprehend that very well but then again, I don't think we would see eye to eye about much. I disagree with the bulk of your posts anyways.
Southern Area ❌
English ❌
British ❌
Commonwealth ❌
European ❌
World ❌
Conor Benn is in no position to criticise other people’s accomplishments therefore that makes him a hypocrite.
Even in comparison to Eubank, who I wasn’t even comparing him to, but since you keep bringing it up, after 6 and a half years as a pro Eubank had won the British title and had at least challenged for World and European titles. So he’s still a hypocrite regardless.
You completely missed the point buddy.Comment
Comment