Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Crawford On Spence: "This Is The Fight Where It Leaves No Doubt Whatsoever About Crawford And His Skills"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Oregonian View Post
    ———
    “All past their prime” and then you proceed with “Crawford beat them in better fashion”.

    When your guy wins, it’s great accomplishments but when the guy you don’t like it did it a few years before your guy, you diminish his wins.

    Sounds like a ….
    Saying those are just names, does not mean that they were at their best went he beat them. Yes I said , Crawford beat them in a better fashion, nothing to be impress by Errol. If Errol does beat Crawford, he beat a 34 year Crawford. But that's if. Errol hasnt even moved up in weight, he is only Champion in one weight Class. He is not impressive. He is weight bully, thats all.
    Last edited by boxingitis; 09-20-2022, 11:24 PM.

    Comment


    • #42
      If the winner retires immediately after....HOFer ?

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by boxingitis View Post

        Saying those are just names, does not mean that they were at their best went he beat them. Yes I said , Crawford beat them in a better fashion, nothing to be impress by Errol. If Errol does beat Crawford, he beat a 34 year Crawford. But that's if. Errol hasnt even moved up in weight, he is only Champion in one weight Class. He is not impressive. He is weight bully, thats all.
        ————
        Crawford beat them years later when they were shop worn.

        But regardless, instead of sticking to what you’re being called out for, you bring other negative things about the guy you clearly don’t like.

        “If Errol beats Crawford, it’s because Bud is old”
        “Errol has found at one weight so he’s a weight bully”


        GGG fought at 160 his whole career until last Saturday so he has to be a weight bully.

        Why so much negativity towards Errol? There are rules about moving up in weight. A lot of boxers have fought at 1 weight.

        Comment


        • #44
          Crawford is just better
          1hourRun 1hourRun likes this.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

            Canelo is the cash cow and the face of the sport...AND he has the best resume.

            He is at the top in both categories.
            You responded to me just to repeat what I already wrote??

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by jonnyc420 View Post

              Don't see much argument here, except one thing, this is only one weight class. He may have the best resume of a WW since the Pacquiao/Mayweather. The question then becomes can he do it at a higher weight? Or over several weight classes? I know young Imam you are itching for a PBC fighter to be the face of the sport but Spence has controlled only a single weight.
              What's wrong with it being just one weight class? ATG Hagler only fought at 160, not many complaints about his resume?

              Comment


              • #47
                The fact is that the people who criticize Crawford , Spence , Canelo are very few , but noisy haters. They obviously don't like skillful fighters , quality champions or great fights. The writer mentions " not the stiffest competition " well that's BS. All three fighters have been in the top P4P list through most of their careers , two undefeated and one defeated only twice while traversing five divisions at only 5'8" and KO'ing a light heavyweight in the process. I really don't even read the trolls , haters posts because they obviously know Jacksht about anything especially boxing.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Spence is a really bad stylistic matchup for Crawford. I don't see why so many people ignore what is quite obvious.
                  Rebelrbg Rebelrbg likes this.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by tokon View Post

                    What's wrong with it being just one weight class? ATG Hagler only fought at 160, not many complaints about his resume?
                    Back in Hagler's day it was more common to stay in a single weight. It's unusual today now when you have guys becoming champs in 3-7 weight classes. Nothing wrong with it, just saying the times have changed.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Amir Imam View Post

                      He controlled a single weight without using catchweights. Easy to jump up and down weight classes when you’re using catchweights. Has nothing to do with pbc or face of the sport because having the best resume don’t mean you’re the face of the sport. Obviously the cash cow and most popular fighter is always the face of the sport which at the moment is Canelo. Two different categories
                      No duh he isn't using catchweights he's been at a single weight his whole career. How do you know he won't in the future when he's only been at one weight? He hasn't left his comfort zone. His career also isn't over yet. He's not really a shot caller yet, which is when the whole CW stuff tends to pick up.
                      Last edited by jonnyc420; 09-21-2022, 07:59 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP