I think it is highly likely we are going to see a better Golovkin from his last fight.
But? Is Alvarez going to be better at 168 pounds? Is his stamina going to be better than it was at 175 pounds vs Bivol?
There is a possibility that he could be even worst.
If Alvarez's plan was to rematch Bivol again, I think he should of made this third fight with Golovkin at 175 pounds. Get really set in the weight class, and explore more with his training and preparation.
I have said from the get go, of this fight being announced. That the 168 pound weight limit, and the constant yo yoing up and down in weight for Alvarez could back fire.
Golovkin needs to improve from his last fight, the version of him vs Murata does not beat Alvarez. But we know for a fact that those extra 8 pounds is going to drastically impact his training, he is not going to be the same fighter he was vs Murata 'He is theoretically going to be slightly boasted'.
Is that boast going to be enough? That is what for me, makes the fight intriguing.
8 pounds is a lot of weight to play around with at this level.
But? Is Alvarez going to be better at 168 pounds? Is his stamina going to be better than it was at 175 pounds vs Bivol?
There is a possibility that he could be even worst.
If Alvarez's plan was to rematch Bivol again, I think he should of made this third fight with Golovkin at 175 pounds. Get really set in the weight class, and explore more with his training and preparation.
I have said from the get go, of this fight being announced. That the 168 pound weight limit, and the constant yo yoing up and down in weight for Alvarez could back fire.
Golovkin needs to improve from his last fight, the version of him vs Murata does not beat Alvarez. But we know for a fact that those extra 8 pounds is going to drastically impact his training, he is not going to be the same fighter he was vs Murata 'He is theoretically going to be slightly boasted'.
Is that boast going to be enough? That is what for me, makes the fight intriguing.
8 pounds is a lot of weight to play around with at this level.
Comment