PBF hasnt fought any dominant fighter who ruled their division.

**DuttyAlacrity** · 09-20-2009, 06:55 PM

Originally posted by hugh grant

Like SRl did against Marvin Hagler. PBF needs to fight someone like a BH type fighter of JC who were kings of their respective divisions.

Pac has even done it against Hatton. Took Hatton apart in the division Hatton ruled. PBF cant say the same thing. Now pac is doing against Cotto. Why hasnt PBF done it yet against Cotto. Cotto and PBF should have had 3 fights by now with each other but no PBF didnt want to take it. Or makes up some excuse why he hasnt fought Cotto yet.
Yet Pac is doing all the donkey work.

errrr
Genaro Hernandez
Luis Castillo
Hatton is a moot point becuz that **** wouldn't have mattered
that's 2 of 3 of his world titles
he's yet to end his career yet so he still has time to fight the "man" @ WW

BTW PAC IS NOT DOING THAT with COTTO
the no 1 guy at WW is SSM

**SkillspayBills** · 09-20-2009, 06:56 PM

Let me show you how.........intelligent....your logic is. You say Floyd doesn't count because he didn't beat Hatton at 140 but Cotto counts because he.........is fighting at a catchweight and not 147. Go figure...try again

**hugh grant** · 09-20-2009, 06:58 PM

Those guys i wouldnt put in the same bracket as good as BH, Marvin Hagler etc. And noone knows those guys as great, great fighters in the top 10 p4p anyway.
Not as goodand achievement as Pac beating Hatton at 140 anyway. PBF is generally accepted as a genuine welterweight now. But why hasnt he fought Cotto when he had the chance to? How come it is that man Pac again?

**StillUnknown** · 09-20-2009, 06:59 PM

its easy to see that people let their hatred corrupt their intelligence

PBF hasnt fought any dominant fighter who ruled their division.