Agree with him. in a mythical p4p fight i'd favor him to stop usyk late unlike aj. i can do this b/c usyk fought outside of heavyweight. no different to me if crawford and lomachenko were in 135 at the same time. crawford would have given him the work too.
Comments Thread For: Terence Crawford: 'I Actually Know I'm No. 1 P4P, There's No Ifs, Ands Or Buts About It'
Collapse
-
Spence has a really good resume. If you fight really good competition, don't you think he's gonna get hit back? He has beat up and dominated everyone he's fought. If Crawford beats Spence, then he can say he's P4P.Comment
-
Comment
-
Maybe I was being a bit mean, yeah if he beats Spence convincingly I will rate if as potential p4p, but he would still need to defend against boots, and ko himComment
-
-
Crawford is a delusional narcissist. His whole resume is full of ifs and buts. His dumbass diva delusion is why he is pricing himself out to duck Spence. The guy has 1 belt to Spence's 3. He sells less PPV than Spence even with the same opponent. But he thinks he deserves 50/50 or more than Spence. He is almost 35 years old without beating a single A class or higher fighter that wasn't inactive, faded or vastly outsized. He is overrated and over hyped for his trash resume.Comment
-
Its going to be a hell of a day in court when he finally sues himself for not getting him the fights he wants!Comment

Comment