Carlos Baldomir > Joshua Clottey

[-GR -]

thats funny considering that clottely was whooping on baldomir till the DQ

and he's better than clottely

Resumes man. Resumes. You telling me Clottey isn't hyped more for his losses?

[-GR -]

Losses are part of the resume and if you don't take how they lost into the equation than you're a gayweather.

You won't find many that think Baldomir could be as competitive against Margarito and Cotto as Clottey was.

Margarito yes. Marg was a plodder with poor defense. Baldo would put up a great fight

[Derranged]

its not hard to see what this really is about.

clottey is a better fighter than baldomir no question about it. but baldomir is a better fighter than most give him credit for ill give u that.

I agree with all of this.

And as for your first sentence... This thread a pathetic attempt to credit Floyd and discredit Cotto if I am not mistaken.

[catalinul]

Baldomir wa svery good at what he did and he won the title.

But I'd pick Clottey H2H to beat him and he was up to the DQ.

[King Flawless]

Look at that poster claiming losses is part of a resume

[catalinul]

Look at that poster claiming losses is part of a resume

Losses are part of a resume.

If you mean resume of wins then you talk wins.If you mean resume of losses then you talk losses.

General resume has both.

[Joe2608]

Losses are part of a resume.

If you mean resume of wins then you talk wins.If you mean resume of losses then you talk losses.

General resume has both.

This is the truth.

[King Flawless]

Losses are part of a resume.

If you mean resume of wins then you talk wins.If you mean resume of losses then you talk losses.

General resume has both.

No, it’s not. It’s about your wins. You get zero credit for losing.

When you talk who is the better fighter, you look who they have beaten. Not who have they lost too.

[catalinul]

No, it’s not. It’s about your wins. You get zero credit for losing.

When you talk who is the better fighter, you look who they have beaten. Not who have they lost too.

You get credit for losses to,it depends on the performance,styles,wrong decisions,etc.

Everybody knows that.

Resumes consists of all kid.

[Heru]

Margarito yes. Marg was a plodder with poor defense. Baldo would put up a great fight

I don't see it. Everything Baldomir does, Margarito does better.

Pressure, punch output, punch variety, power, and they're about equal in chin. I can see Margarito putting so many uppercuts and right hands on CB's face it's not eve funny. Would be a war though.

Losses are part of a resume.

If you mean resume of wins then you talk wins.If you mean resume of losses then you talk losses.

General resume has both.

What a clown that guy is. Losses aren't part of the resume... GTFOH

And not taking what happened in the loss is just nuthuggery.