Nobody beats prime Cus D'amato Tyson

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • War Room
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jan 2014
    • 9296
    • 2,806
    • 662
    • 19,006

    #11
    Originally posted by lopetego
    Vitali Klitschko would have beaten prime Tyson

    too strong, too iron chinned, too smart, he can box and brawl, way superior to Tyson fitness wise, too

    Mike would start to fade after 5-6 rounds, he was never able to maintain that high level of pressure and intensity for too long

    Vitali could fight effectively for the full 12 rounds, and he's even tougher than Holyfield and can absord more damage if need be

    Vitali would dwarf Tyson's reach, made him eat jabs and straights for the first rounds, tie him up if needed, then surgically destroy him in the later rounds

    plus, a big part of Tyson's gameplan was his boogeyman aura, the FEAR he instilled on his opponents. Vitali can't be intimidated.

    Vitali by late TKO
    I went back and watched some Vitali recently and he's not as bad ass as I thought he was. Byrd made him quit and wass really hurting him. Iron Mike sparks Vitali under 6.

    Comment

    • Quercusalba
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2020
      • 1732
      • 685
      • 556
      • 2,792

      #12
      Originally posted by MONGOOSE66

      Could it be because he was 19 at the time? Moron.
      Nah, what I said makes perfect sense. If one claims D'amato trained Tyson beats them all, then we are forced to look at what D'amato trained Tyson accomplished in order to elicit such praise. A young Mike Tyson with 10 or 11 fights represents the whole of his career under Cus. This is all we can objectively evaluate. If I were to say Kronk Lennox Lewis is the best heavyweight ever, I'd objectively point to what he specifically accomplished while working Emanuel Steward, not what I subjectively think he was theoretically capable of. To say D'amato trained Tyson passed some sort of eye-test and consequently assume that iteration of Tyson was indestructible is purely subjective.

      Comment

      • dirty fingers
        bare knuckler
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2009
        • 2377
        • 266
        • 579
        • 18,282

        #13
        Originally posted by JakePaul
        I'd beat the **** out of Prime Tyson
        Hell yeah!!

        Comment

        • MONGOOSE66
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Sep 2011
          • 7739
          • 1,609
          • 620
          • 29,199

          #14
          Originally posted by Quercusalba

          Nah, what I said makes perfect sense. If one claims D'amato trained Tyson beats them all, then we are forced to look at what D'amato trained Tyson accomplished in order to elicit such praise. A young Mike Tyson with 10 or 11 fights represents the whole of his career under Cus. This is all we can objectively evaluate. If I were to say Kronk Lennox Lewis is the best heavyweight ever, I'd objectively point to what he specifically accomplished while working Emanuel Steward, not what I subjectively think he was theoretically capable of. To say D'amato trained Tyson passed some sort of eye-test and consequently assume that iteration of Tyson was indestructible is purely subjective.
          So, U think a 19 year old should of fought everyone at that age? To argue that point says volumes to your ******ity.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP