Fighters should go for the knockout against an outmatched opponent.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • VG_Addict
    king meat's twin
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2012
    • 5618
    • 237
    • 3
    • 53,380

    #1

    Fighters should go for the knockout against an outmatched opponent.

    Hot take: If a fighter is dominating a fight, he should try to knock out or stop his opponent instead of settling for a decision. Nobody wants to see a fighter play tag against an outmatched opponent.
  • real raw
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Apr 2011
    • 923
    • 281
    • 5,068
    • 7,965

    #2
    I agree but for different reasons. One shouldn't let an opponent hand around due to increased chances of a freak accident happening. Cut, intentional foul, or a rallying comeback. Get em out of there and go home early.

    Comment

    • -Kev-
      this is boxing
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2006
      • 39960
      • 5,045
      • 1,449
      • 234,543

      #3
      If you don’t have the power, you can’t help it. Not every great fighter has the power to just KO an outmatched opponent. Plus it also depends on the outmatched opponent and how strong he is as far taking a punch goes.

      Lastly, sometimes what makes a fighter dominate so easily is because of how little of a chance he gives his opponent to hit him. Maybe that’s just his style and that makes him great.

      I thought AJ looked outmatched in there vs Usyk, you can even see Usyk clearly went for the KO. He couldn’t get it.

      If every fight was like prime Mike Tyson vs Larry Holmes, that would be fun. But it’s not, and it never will be. There are different styles, strengths and weaknesses.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP