Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Charlo-Tszyu, Canelo-GGG, Paul-Rahman, More

[ShoulderRoll]

As a boxing fan I want to see good fights happen sooner rather than later. PBC not making Charlo vs Tszyu until next January is some whack ass sh-t from a fan perspective.

Good mailbag as usual. In thinking about Marquez’s resume, he may have a case for the best wins by a Mexican born fighter when you take into account who he’s beaten and when he beat them from pac, to Barrera(controversial) , casamayor, Juan Diaz, salido, Juárez, katsidis and Alvarado.
Also, Bread mentioning how he gets hate mail from canelo fans is funny af. It’s one thing to compliment or criticize boxers on a forum, but to be such a butt hurt bozo to send hate mail to the writer of a mailbag because you’re obsessively defensive of a boxer that doesn’t even know you exist is hysterical.

Bread also mentioned that GGG fans get angry. Why did you leave that out and just single out Canelo fans?

No need to respond back. That's a rhetorical question, we all know why.

[Jab jab boom]

As a boxing fan I want to see good fights happen sooner rather than later. PBC not making Charlo vs Tszyu until next January is some whack ass sh-t from a fan perspective.




Bread also mentioned that GGG fans get angry. Why did you leave that out and just single out Canelo fans?

No need to respond back. That's a rhetorical question, we all know why.

I will respond back because like the other guy, your reading comprehension is clearly limited. Here is exactly what bread wrote and these 2 things are quite different.

GGG’s fans get angry. When I answer in favor of GGG, Canelo’s fans send me hate mail.

[TheCell8]

It's simple: If Golovkin knocks out Canelo he goes down as the GOAT MW (even if this fight is at 168). Marvelous Marvin need not apply.

[Greenfield02]

Oh Jab Jab Whimpers (Boom) again you come back with your weak arguments, trying really hard to speak like their someone who thinks he knows what he's talking about.... There is no argument for Marquez as the best wins by a Mexican fighter. You conveniently leave out that Sanchez beat 4 Hall of Famers in Nelson, Lopez, La Porte, and Gomez. All by K.O and by the age of 23, now tell me, who in boxing History has defeated 4 Hall of Famers by the age of 23? Chavez beat 17 world champions in an era where they weren't handing out Belts like they do now, amongst those champions include Ramirez, Limon, Haugen, Fuentes, La Porte, ect ect who are way better than Diaz, Casamayor and those dudes you mentioned Marquez beat, but I'm going to leave it at that, I'm not going to argue with a guy who thinks Mayweather and Crawford are the best fighter of all time, by the way Mayweather beat 5 Hall of Famers in his career all who were over 30 and past their prime, never fought top opponents in their prime and beat 12 total champions, and as for Crawford he's 33 and never beaten any Hall of Famers or anyone relevant for that matter.....

[Jab jab boom]

Oh Jab Jab Whimpers (Boom) again you come back with your weak arguments, trying really hard to speak like their someone who thinks he knows what he's talking about.... There is no argument for Marquez as the best wins by a Mexican fighter. You conveniently leave out that Sanchez beat 4 Hall of Famers in Nelson, Lopez, La Porte, and Gomez. All by K.O and by the age of 23, now tell me, who in boxing History has defeated 4 Hall of Famers by the age of 23? Chavez beat 17 world champions in an era where they weren't handing out Belts like they do now, amongst those champions include Ramirez, Limon, Haugen, Fuentes, La Porte, ect ect who are way better than Diaz, Casamayor and those dudes you mentioned Marquez beat, but I'm going to leave it at that, I'm not going to argue with a guy who thinks Mayweather and Crawford are the best fighter of all time, by the way Mayweather beat 5 Hall of Famers in his career all who were over 30 and past their prime, never fought top opponents in their prime and beat 12 total champions, and as for Crawford he's 33 and never beaten any Hall of Famers or anyone relevant for that matter.....

meanwhile you leave out that when Sanchez beat Nelson, Nelson only had 13 fights at the time and fought someone making their pro debut before facing Sanchez, you also leave out that Laporte only had 16 and only fought novices before facing Sanchez. But you want to minimize Floyd beating Canelo who had over 40 fights and faced multiple world champions because he was too young. Lol. The names on Chavez resume are average and on par with Marquez wins other than the ones I mentioned. 2 hall of famers, that’s it. Pac is a better win than what any of them have had so that puts marquez in the argument along with his other wins.

I’ve never claimed Floyd (who btw, has more wins than just 5 hall of famers when pac and Canelo are eligible) or Crawford are the greatest of all time but I have seen you nut guzzle canelo who ironically, speaking to your point, has his best wins against 35 (not 30) and older/past prime opponents. Yet you’d let him tea bag you if you could.

[Roadblock]

I think Tszyu had hand surgery maybe thats why the fight is so far away. Good read Bread.

[Greenfield02]

Jab Jab Whimpers, who the hell is talking about Canelo? You want to diminish Sanchez victories because of experience, but then you want to give Mayweather credit for beating Canelo when Canelo was 21, (not his prime) then you diminish Canelo even more by saying he's beaten no one, but again you want to give Mayweather big props for beating him. So what is it, is Canelo first ballot Hall of Fame, one of the best of his time, or just some dude who has had it easy? Because if it's the latter, then Mayweather beating him when he was a novice is not that impressive, so which is it? Can't have it both ways... And then you talk about 35, how old was Mosley when Mayweather beat him? Or De la Hoya, or Pac, again you want to crap on Canelo who I think is good not great, but you want to praise Mayweather for the same sh**. And I've seen your little list of greatest of all time and your P4P list who you continue to put Crawford at the top with absolutely no relevant wins against top opponents or even one Hall of Famer....

[Jab jab boom]

Jab Jab Whimpers, who the hell is talking about Canelo? You want to diminish Sanchez victories because of experience, but then you want to give Mayweather credit for beating Canelo when Canelo was 21, (not his prime) then you diminish Canelo even more by saying he's beaten no one, but again you want to give Mayweather big props for beating him. So what is it, is Canelo first ballot Hall of Fame, one of the best of his time, or just some dude who has had it easy? Because if it's the latter, then Mayweather beating him when he was a novice is not that impressive, so which is it? Can't have it both ways... And then you talk about 35, how old was Mosley when Mayweather beat him? Or De la Hoya, or Pac, again you want to crap on Canelo who I think is good not great, but you want to praise Mayweather for the same sh**. And I've seen your little list of greatest of all time and your P4P list who you continue to put Crawford at the top with absolutely no relevant wins against top opponents or even one Hall of Famer....

First, canelo was 23, not 21 you casual. He had over 40 pro fights and had already faced former champs mosley, baldomir, cintron and current champ trout who had just beat Cotto. Now look at who Nelson and Laporte faced before Sanchez so you could feel like a bozo. Meanwhile Floyd was the ripe old age of 36, the same age we’ve both established is past prime right? Don’t you hate when sh** like that happens and proves what a hypocrite you are? And I’ve never created a p4p list or posted one on here. Stop making sh** up to fit your inaccurate narrative. Everything else you wrote is irrelevant.

[Shadoww702]

Good mailbag as usual. In thinking about Marquez’s resume, he may have a case for the best wins by a Mexican born fighter when you take into account who he’s beaten and when he beat them from pac, to Barrera(controversial) , casamayor, Juan Diaz, salido, Juárez, katsidis and Alvarado.
Also, Bread mentioning how he gets hate mail from canelo fans is funny af. It’s one thing to compliment or criticize boxers on a forum, but to be such a butt hurt bozo to send hate mail to the writer of a mailbag because you’re obsessively defensive of a boxer that doesn’t even know you exist is hysterical.

He said he gets it from BOTH sides.

[Jab jab boom]

He said he gets it from BOTH sides.

he said ggg fans “get mad” , he said canelo fans send him “hate mail”. Those are 2 different extremes.