Comments Thread For: Crawford Dismisses Spence Comparison In Their Wins Over Porter

[BodyBagz]

Must be hard to be Dud fan

[peplz]

You have to consider the gap between the respective fights.

The versions of Brook and Porter that Spence fought were superior to the Brook and Porter that Crawford fought. Also Brook won the first 2 round against Crawford then got hit with a great shot and was done. That’s a broken man. Porter and Crawford were fighting to a damn near draw.

Lol. The point of the comment that you just replied to is that the false narrative and the Spence fairytale consists of the lies that you are attempting to assert in your comment.

[TMT_HEAT]

Lol. The point of the comment that you just replied to is that the false narrative and the Spence fairytale consists of the lies that you are attempting to assert in your comment.

You simply can’t compare the performances no matter how much you try.

[MONGOOSE66]

Unfortunately most
people on here don’t understand Crawford’s comment.

[peplz]

You simply can’t compare the performances no matter how much you try.

I don’t need to try. The proof is in the pudding. Its Spence fans who are doing all the trying by desperately attempting to create some false narratives by grasping at straws and coming up with all kinds of alibis and excuses for Errol Spence. Crawford has out performed Spence and its as simple as that. The rest is y’all over analyzing and trying to come up with reasons to discredit Crawford’s performances. It falls on deaf ears if you’re talking to me.