Bobby Czyz

[Kimmy]

Well..i wouldn`t be that harsh. Czyz was a two weight champ albeit against weak opponents. Moving up to heavyweight was the most ****** idea he had. Being that the crusier weight division is always full of weak champs he should hve stayed there and waited for a shot against a weak champion, he might have regained a title at some point!

[Kimmy]

Just a quick thought now i remembered. On his record Czyz never loses his WBA title in the ring. Whats the deal here? i mean, he was stripped i guess but why? Can anyone explain this?

[masterdirector]

He probably refused to defend it against some bs opponent. Probably had a better deal where he could get more money for doing something other than defending that bull**** WBA title. Cause one, if he defended their title, he'd have to pay them a huge sanctioning fee and he might have gotten a smaller purse. That's probably it. Usually is.

Hence why I think we need a pro boxing league rather than sanctioning bodies. Boxing is the only sport I'm aware of that requires the champions to pay for their championships.

[Soundtraveler]

He probably refused to defend it against some bs opponent. Probably had a better deal where he could get more money for doing something other than defending that bull**** WBA title. Cause one, if he defended their title, he'd have to pay them a huge sanctioning fee and he might have gotten a smaller purse. That's probably it. Usually is.

Hence why I think we need a pro boxing league rather than sanctioning bodies. Boxing is the only sport I'm aware of that requires the champions to pay for their championships.

Now that I will agree with...

[Slipx]

He was a white bum obviously.

well

he was the champ at one time

were you ever the champ?

if not, that makes you lower than what you think he is. meaning your like a hiv ****sexual sodomite bum that digs in garbage cans, if you really think czyz is a bum.

[joeboxer]

well

he was the champ at one time

were you ever the champ?

if not, that makes you lower than what you think he is. meaning your like a hiv ****sexual sodomite bum that digs in garbage cans, if you really think czyz is a bum.

Interesting logic. I'm not sure I follow how you deduced he has hiv but, if you say so.

[Slipx]

preciate all the good karma

[barryboy]

Just a quick thought now i remembered. On his record Czyz never loses his WBA title in the ring. Whats the deal here? i mean, he was stripped i guess but why? Can anyone explain this?

I think he had a bad back injury & he couldn't defend the title so they had to strip him.

[TheRealDunnagan]

well

he was the champ at one time

were you ever the champ?

if not, that makes you lower than what you think he is. meaning your like a hiv ****sexual sodomite bum that digs in garbage cans, if you really think czyz is a bum.

roflz. too funny slipx,put that bish in his place, hes quiet and didnt even reply


+k to you bud

[masterdirector]

well

he was the champ at one time

were you ever the champ?

if not, that makes you lower than what you think he is. meaning your like a hiv ****sexual sodomite bum that digs in garbage cans, if you really think czyz is a bum.

That was you "owning" me? lol okay if you say so.

He was the champ at one time. A portion of the championship at least. The cruiserweight champ at that. I'm not a fighter, he was.

So your point is like saying Bill Cartwright was a good basketball player because he won the NBA championship multiple times. Would Cartwright beat me in basketball? Probably.

Would Czyz beat me in a boxing match? Err...maybe. Pretty impressive for a boxer to beat a non-boxer in a boxing match. That proves his greatness? That's what it takes to prove someone isn't a bum? I thought it took beating good fighters, which Czyz didn't really do.

That is a lame ass bull**** fake fan argument. "Well, he'd kick your ass." So? Your point? You only strengthen my point that Czyz ******. He'd have to beat a lot of guys at around my skill level (zero) to pad his record so he could lose to a Holyfield.

And let's ask this question, mr. boxing wizard. Would your ****** ass actually pay to see Bobby Czyz over Pac vs. Morales? We already know the answer to that now don't we.

If nothing else, you put Pac and Morales on the same level as Czyz, possibly lower, since you wouldn't even pay to see those two actual good fighters, possibly eventual great fighters go at it. You even said that Pac vs. Morales had the potiential to be a flop. Fool. Like Czyz's career wasn't one giant flop?

**** off. You lose.