Originally posted by DFM
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Katie Taylor Rallies To Secure Split Decision Over Amanda Serrano in Classic
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by El Más Loco View Post
So a 7-3 scorecard in a razor close fight is not a gift decision? Sounds like youre the one that doesnt know boxing......
Comment
-
Originally posted by CineScape View PostRobbed. Serrano fought similar to fuc king Beterbiev and he would’ve taken the win. Wtf!
She had Taylor ready to go but couldn't finish. Katie was in great shape and able to adjust and make a comeback down the stretch. Amanda wilted and stopped punching for a few rounds.Hnnnggg likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Earl-Hickey View Post
You are running around claiming gift decision in a fight that was EASY to score.
Shut the **** up man.
Katie is a warrior but her constantly getting gift decisions against non-Hearn house fighters makes her highly unlikable, through no fault of her own.Roj likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Thatmanox View Post
really didn’t even want to quote this since you clearly don’t know boxing. The “f’ing robbery” comment was funny though. Taylor won by a clear 3 rounds. Blame your boricua for taking her foot off the gas, gassing out, and giving up the entire 2nd half of the fight my guy.
Comment
-
First of all great fight and respect to both of these Ladies
I had Amanda winning and holding on to a lead after Katie recovered worked her way back, a Draw would've been far more appropriate IMO
that one Score Card was just absolutely insulting and it confirms people su****ion of the blatant corruption in boxing in which Judges are taking $$$ to fix fights. Basically in that judges Eye, it was nothing Amanda could've done to win that fight
Regardless of ****** Judges and Corruption that doesn't take away from the effort that both of those ladies gave in that ring. Still a very Historic Night For Women Boxing lets hope they can build off of that Momentum with Shields vs Marshall, Baumgardner vs Mayer next and that they too can deliver thrilling fightsRoj
El Más Loco like this.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Earl-Hickey View Post
That one card was 1 point too wide, the card for serrano was more wrong than that, Taylor won by 2-3 rounds, it's really not debatable and you are a biased troll.
Comment
-
A 96-93 card sounds like a judge gave Taylor a 10-8 round, which makes no sense. 96-94 would be 6-4 Taylor. I actually thought that might have been a wrong card, with Serrano winning by that and getting a 10-8 round. I had it 5-5, 95-95, didn't care who won, but Serrano gave away too many close rounds.
Comment
-
Comment