Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Nico Ali Walsh: I Think Tyson Fury is a Top Five Heavyweight of All Time

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Nico Ali Walsh has only fought 4 professional fights, and is already making punch drunk statement's.
    I'm not saying he's punch drunk, what I'm saying is he doesn't what he's talking about.
    As good as Tyson Fury is, he's not in the top 5, 10, or possibly 20 best heavyweights of all time.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Boricua181 View Post
      Nico Ali Walsh has only fought 4 professional fights, and is already making punch drunk statement's.
      I'm not saying he's punch drunk, what I'm saying is he doesn't what he's talking about.
      As good as Tyson Fury is, he's not in the top 5, 10, or possibly 20 best heavyweights of all time.
      And you’ve fought no pro fights and your a bum who knows nothing.

      I don’t really mean the above statement.

      I’m just showing you how daft it Is to be disrespectful when This fighter is giving his opinion.

      Disagree by all means. But don’t make derogatory comments about fighters for simply having an opinion. Especially if you aren’t making the same sacrifices and risks in boxing as he is.

      Comment


      • #13
        I love when someone mentioned the best of all time stuff and all of us goobers come out of the woodwork to fight about it.

        Comment


        • #14
          Oh please, where does one start with dissecting this utter drivel. Predictably American rubbish (garbage) lol

          Comment


          • #15
            This isn’t even up for debate seeing the crop of heavyweights he has fought and beaten. He has talent is big and has managed to get up and return fire in awesome ways, but being dropped by so so fighters and winning just doesn’t qualify you as an all time great! Sorry Tyson

            Comment


            • #16
              I think one could make an argument that Fury is top 12 of all time, and on ability alone, top 5 to 7.

              But on his record and who he's had to beat, hard to put him firmly in top 5.

              It's not Fury's fault he doesn't have to fight an Ali, Foreman, Frazier, Liston, Louis, Mike Tyson, Lewis, Holyfield, Norton and Bowe.

              I wouldn't underestimate how good or great the old timers were, namely Johnson, Dempsey, Tunney and Marciano.

              There were guys who didn't become champion who were so tough, like Chuvalo, Lyle and Shavers.

              Fury is one of the most versatile though, can box on outside, brawl, switch stances well, and is huge, so he'd always be competitive.

              Comment


              • #17
                Everyone getting riled up, let's be serious, Fury has accomplished a bit, has some skills, but he's a product of a lackluster HW division. I mean would you really put him above, Ali, Frazier, Holmes, Norton, Dempsey, Marciano, Jack Johnson, Tyson, Holyfield, Forman, ect, ect, and on and on. Any of those Mentioned would most likely K.O Fury, and if you think otherwise, you probably don't know much history of the HW division....
                Sosay Sosay likes this.

                Comment


                • #18
                  I love the Gypsy King but no way. This is the worst Era in history. Not top 3 in the past 20 years.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    I think Tyson is great and is deserving of a top 14 place. I think his resume is not the strongest, but he places that high on the basis of doing well h2h with anyone in history. Let s rephrase that If he were to beat Usyk and Josh, then you can assume he'd do well h2h in history. His resume would be quite good. Then he would get into top 5 for combination of resume and his h2h
                    Last edited by hugh grant; 04-29-2022, 04:58 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Greenfield02 View Post
                      Everyone getting riled up, let's be serious, Fury has accomplished a bit, has some skills, but he's a product of a lackluster HW division. I mean would you really put him above, Ali, Frazier, Holmes, Norton, Dempsey, Marciano, Jack Johnson, Tyson, Holyfield, Forman, ect, ect, and on and on. Any of those Mentioned would most likely K.O Fury, and if you think otherwise, you probably don't know much history of the HW division....
                      Would they ****. Norton is a nobody who the overrated Ali made look good. Did nothing else in his career. Holmes!!! Yeah, what a strong era that was. LMAO. Holmes is a poor man's Kevin Johnson. Mike Tyson! He wouldn't beat Hughie. And Foreman is just a big, stiff pudding. Chisora is the 2nd coming of Frazier and look how he got on vs Prime Fury in the rematch. Nash out - boxing expert.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP