Fight to win or fight to entertain...reply.
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Those guys are some of my favorites. Cotto hasn't fought to entertain as of late. However I would prefer a clinic boxing master piece with side stepping, feints, latteral movement, angles, excellent defense, accuracy, and skill over a bar room sloppy katsidis brawl any day. I like my fighters to pain pictures with their firsts.Comment
-
You fight to win. Simple as. Next time someone wins a fuc.king "Entertainer of the World" strap, I might change my mind.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Since Al Gaymon ignored me cuz' i own him and Kevin Jesus here is proof.
As for Forrest, fans didn't forgive him for losing cuz' his style was not exciting.
Thus proving my point. You have to do BOTH!!
IF YOU FIGHT TO ENTERTAIN, FANS FORGIVE YOUR LOSSES YOU HOOKER.
Doug Fischer wrote a great article about this very phenomenon.
Suck it losers.
http://www.ringtv.com/blog/1092/is_m...or_perfection/
Fans forgive....promoters and the big channel bosses HBO and shotime..dont.Comment
-
I'm sorry,but Ivan Calderon has been fighting to win and it ain't entertaining at all.
I can accept that every now and then, but for one to do that every time its quite boring.
I hav'nt seen all of Calderon fights so its nothing directed towards him. Im just picking his last fight as an example.Comment
Comment