Can the same logic for Pacquiao be used for Canelo?

[HrNY]

Pacquiao got knocked out at lower weights and then came up in weight and started doing the knocking out and people cried he was on steroids.

Canelo got rocked by the lesser Cotto at 147 and then came up in weight and started knocking out bigger guys and actually tested positive for steroids, but where are all the cries for him being on steroids?

How come this logic can be used for Pacquiao, but not Canelo?

This is a serious question too, so for all the Canelo stans please don't get all your panties in a bunch, if you got a legit answer cool, if you want to bitch and moan, please bounce

[Silence]

Half of PEDs/steroid posts are about Canelo. What are you talking about? You're just another hater bum. You'll learn to respect greatness.

[MikeyMike100]

Yes they are both very su****ious

[HrNY]

Half of PEDs/steroid posts are about Canelo. What are you talking about? You're just another hater bum. You'll learn to respect greatness.

They say Canelo's greatest "win" was against GGG.

They also say GGG was a hyped up eurobum.

So Canelo's greatest "win" was against a hyped up eurobum?

lol got to love that logic right there too.

But back to your post, "half of PEDs/steroid posts are about Canelo"? Guess we aren't reading the same threads, I'm not seeing it, but if you are, kudos to you you ugly ass bum.

gtfo my thread you alt/troll

[The Big Dunn]

I think it’s reasonable to treat Canelo’s positive test the same way you treat Manny’s refusing to test.

The fact is most people that don’t like either will use PED’s to discredit them. That is how the fans of both of these boxers treat other boxers so I can’t see how it’s a problem.

[Hustle]

People have gone from 147 to 175 before, but nobody ever went from 108 to 150. So thats the su****ion.

But to be fair, canelo failed a drug test and pacquiao didnt, so i see your point

[HrNY]

People have gone from 147 to 175 before, but nobody ever went from 108 to 150. So thats the su****ion.

But to be fair, canelo failed a drug test and pacquiao didnt, so i see your point

I hear you on the weight thing from 108 to 150 but Pacquiao's been at that 140+ mark even in the 130 days. It's not like he all of a sudden grew some line backer type neck and shoulders like Canelo did.

Pacquiao was knocking fools out in the lower weights. He got ricky hatton at 140 from a perfect punch, but Cotto at 147, I could've easily seen Cotto finishing the fight. After Cotto, he didn't get a knock out until Lucas and that was it.

Canelo on the other hand, I can't even remember who he was knocking out at 154 who was of note. Sure he got Rhodes, Cintron, Gomez, but he couldn't take out a past it Shane and Cotto, but now he's not only knocking fools out at heavier weights, but breaking the cheek/eye etc

I laugh too when they asked Canelo for a hair sample and he refused, only to finally give in a lot later than it was asked. Like he had to wait till whatever was in his system left to finally say ok here's a sample lol

[Roadblock]

They say Canelo's greatest "win" was against GGG.

They also say GGG was a hyped up eurobum.

So Canelo's greatest "win" was against a hyped up eurobum?

lol got to love that logic right there too.

But back to your post, "half of PEDs/steroid posts are about Canelo"? Guess we aren't reading the same threads, I'm not seeing it, but if you are, kudos to you you ugly ass bum.

gtfo my thread you alt/troll

GGG is no bum, not by a country mile, his only crime was his ****** fanboys claiming best ever MW and such nonsense, GGG is a handful for any MW in history a win over him is a very good win.

[HrNY]

GGG is no bum, not by a country mile, his only crime was his ****** fanboys claiming best ever MW and such nonsense, GGG is a handful for any MW in history a win over him is a very good win.

I know, I love GGG. People just wanted to fight him when he started slowing down. But a lot of people say GGG was a fraud etc. So I found that funny that Canelo's supposedly best "win" was against someone they're calling a fraud etc. And Canelo's "win" was a very tight SD that he himself was surprised to get. If you know you won, you don't look that surprised and happy when they announce your name as the winner.

[hugh grant]

I think it’s reasonable to treat Canelo’s positive test the same way you treat Manny’s refusing to test.

The fact is most people that don’t like either will use PED’s to discredit them. That is how the fans of both of these boxers treat other boxers so I can’t see how it’s a problem.

But people say Pac was on peds not because haven in past been reluctant to take a test. It's more he was doing things people shouldn't be doing like knocking out 147 guys having started at 108.
People su****ious of nel o as he's tested positive. People su****ious of Floyd as he had IV