Roy Jones Jr vs Thomas Hearns at supermiddle. Who win this??

[Heru]

anybody who says Hearns can beat roy at 168 is a dumb ass, Roy was unbeatable when he fought at 168. Hearns best weight was 154, Hearns wouldn't beat James Toney at 168 either

**** outta here with that . Hearns wouldn't have came in at the limit and he'd still be able to crack Roy's chin. Toney had a better style to beat Hearns, that jumping in and out **** Roy does would not fly with TH.

Roy would have a lot of respect for Hearns' power and try to play keep away from the outside. Tommy's long, fast, snapping jab would be a problem and he'd be able to land sooner or later on Roy. I don't think he'd be able to take it either.

One thing everyone that beat a prime/close to prime Hearns have in common is a great chin something you nor I know if Jones has. So you're the dumbass for saying that bull****.

[nachorjj]

Hearns is great and Roy would have to be carefull about the straight right but eventually he would find his way to land big on Hearns and stop him just like Leonard in their first fight. In this fight Roy is the bigger version of Ray Leonard, just as good speed but more unpredictable and with more power.

total agree i am fan of ray and roy but roy have more conditions

[Joe2608]

Jones would beat him, too fast.

[djtmal]

tommy's my boy, and i know he can outbox roy, but he couldn't take it to the body his whole career...jones was more of a headhunter @ 168, but went to the body with good results when he needed to, usually against the longer, tougher opposition...@ 168 i don't know if he could take tommy's right hand flush, but he was fast enough to avoid tommy's big shots, or at least roll with them, and strong enough to do damage downstairs and walk him down...jones ud 12

[Frank Martin]

I was about to post this but you got me. Hearns has glass chin. Jones by KO.