Odd post. How is Oscar and Whitaker on a lower level than Floyd or Leonard?
Crawford is in a peculiar position. On paper he has accomplished enough to be a HOF'er, even without an elite level opponent on his resume. Therein lies the rub--while he does pass the eyeball test for greatness, he hasn't been pushed to his limits or tested by another elite level fighter. Part of that is because they are avoiding him, and hiding behind the Haymon Protection Plan. The other part of that is because he signed with Arum in hopes of getting the Manny payday, knowing it may get in the way of making fights with all of the PBC welters. He gambled on that Manny payday. Even still, he has earned just as much as Spence in the ring and has earned more than all of PBC fighters below HW outside of Spence.
If Crawford is to be mentioned in the same sentence as the ATGs, he'll need to defeat a few of the top WW and maybe Jr. Middles to get there. Spence, Ugas, Thurman, and possibly Ortiz or Ennis if they step up soon--clean out the division. Win a title at 154 if he can get Charlo to fight him, which is highly unlikely. The clock is ticking on his prime though, and he'll need to make something happen if he truly cares about his legacy.
Oscar struggled against Ike and Pernell doesn't have any fighters on his resume comparable to Crawford, Spence, Floyd, or Manny. He arguably lost to Chavez
Oscar struggled against Ike and Pernell doesn't have any fighters on his resume comparable to Crawford, Spence, Floyd, or Manny. He arguably lost to Chavez
Most people agree that it was Whitaker who was robbed in the Chavez fight.
Comment