Comments Thread For: Taylor-Catterall: WBO Previously Objected BBBoC Appointment Of Judges Lewis And Loughlin

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Taylor-Catterall: WBO Previously Objected BBBoC Appointment Of Judges Lewis And Loughlin

    Amidst the ongoing investigation surrounding the widely criticized outcome in the Josh Taylor-Jack Catterall junior welterweight championship fight is the question of why two of the judges were there at all.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • rudy
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 5878
    • 657
    • 1,166
    • 52,192

    #2
    Boxing is corrupt why have a scottish judge and Ian John Lewis has always been bent

    Comment

    • 1hourRun
      SQUAD-UP!
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2010
      • 20526
      • 2,789
      • 2,336
      • 140,312

      #3




      Well-well-well, look whos laughing now 'Tart-Tomato' fans? Some of you will remember how you all mocked me and claimed that I was a nutjob for telling it like it was, that Victor Loughlin and Ian John Lewis aided Josh Taylor in his fights with Viktor Postol and Ryan Martin.

      I want to say that this win for me not only cements my credibility but should strengthen my argument against Tyson Fury and Katie Taylor's fraudulent careers, and any other bum that I expose in the future. I told you all that Jack Catterall was getting robbed, my detailed investigations would of led you to the same conclusion, if you listened.

      Comment

      • P to the J
        GAARR-bidge DAAY!
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2018
        • 2731
        • 1,246
        • 2,379
        • 9,102

        #4
        I'd say its a pretty bad day when a boxing organization ends up looking less corrupt than you do

        Comment

        • P to the J
          GAARR-bidge DAAY!
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2018
          • 2731
          • 1,246
          • 2,379
          • 9,102

          #5
          Originally posted by 1hourRun




          Well-well-well, look whos laughing now 'Tart-Tomato' fans? Some of you will remember how you all mocked me and claimed that I was a nutjob for telling it like it was, that Victor Loughlin and Ian John Lewis aided Josh Taylor in his fights with Viktor Postol and Ryan Martin.

          I want to say that this win for me not only cements my credibility but should strengthen my argument against Tyson Fury and Katie Taylor's fraudulent careers, and any other bum that I expose in the future. I told you all that Jack Catterall was getting robbed, my detailed investigations would of led you to the same conclusion, if you listened.

          Yo, but you forgot to include Howard Foster in your list of dodgy judges. Kept the same cards as all of the above till the end, and always pulling corrupt **** whether reffing or judging.

          Only reason he's not under microscope here is because he pulled out that last card for Catterall

          Comment

          • Georgie Do
            Up and Comer
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • Apr 2021
            • 32
            • 9
            • 6
            • 0

            #6
            I watched the fill fight at least twice and replayed some of the controversial parts. It was scrappy and not pleasant to watch but Jack did school Josh, I have no doubt about that. Here,s the thing.
            Josh could not win the fight without stopping Jack. Josh,s own corner toldchim that. So OK.
            Why not call it a draw.??? If they were not sure.
            Champion's do get preferential treatment but this was disgraceful. Josh did not win that fight. So for me. I am pretty sick of the whole mess. There are questions being asked about the Elephant in the room. I will not be watching any more Taylor fights or any thing organised and backed financially by the Elephant in the room and that means tbe heavyweights and all., seeing what happens to Jack and how he was robbed blind, has cured me of boxing.

            Comment

            • BomaE
              Up and Comer
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • May 2021
              • 75
              • 66
              • 12
              • 0

              #7
              Originally posted by Georgie Do
              I watched the fill fight at least twice and replayed some of the controversial parts. It was scrappy and not pleasant to watch but Jack did school Josh, I have no doubt about that. Here,s the thing.
              Josh could not win the fight without stopping Jack. Josh,s own corner toldchim that. So OK.
              Why not call it a draw.??? If they were not sure.
              Champion's do get preferential treatment but this was disgraceful. Josh did not win that fight. So for me. I am pretty sick of the whole mess. There are questions being asked about the Elephant in the room. I will not be watching any more Taylor fights or any thing organised and backed financially by the Elephant in the room and that means tbe heavyweights and all., seeing what happens to Jack and how he was robbed blind, has cured me of boxing.
              I stoped watching the replay after 5 rounds. It's was like wwe and scrappy like u said. Didn't seem like a boxing match at all.

              Comment

              • Clegg
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2008
                • 24674
                • 3,726
                • 2,307
                • 233,274

                #8
                Robert Smith should go. Too much of this BS under his watch and his only reply is "somebody else think of an idea". The corrupt old boys network running the sport over here should all be cleared out, but there doesn't seem to be enough public pressure to make that happen.

                Comment

                • 1hourRun
                  SQUAD-UP!
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 20526
                  • 2,789
                  • 2,336
                  • 140,312

                  #9
                  Originally posted by P to the J


                  Yo, but you forgot to include Howard Foster in your list of dodgy judges. Kept the same cards as all of the above till the end, and always pulling corrupt **** whether reffing or judging.

                  Only reason he's not under microscope here is because he pulled out that last card for Catterall
                  You are right, Howard Foster has been suspect in the past.

                  This article states that Howard Foster has met all requirements to be a WBO certified judge, However, the report also informs that Ian John Lewis and Victor Loughlin were not approved by the World Boxing Organization.

                  This controversy has got even more strange, who appointed Lewis and Loughlin? What the hell is BBBofC secretary Robert Smith going to do about it? I remember when Terry O'Connor was using a phone during as he judged Lewis Riston vs. Miguel 'Titere' Vazquez -- a fight that turned out to be a robbery. Smith, basically said that they did not see nothing, even though the evidence was clear.

                  Anyways, I'm following the trail all the way down to the offices of the BBBofC, but there is blame to go around I wonder if the other sanctioning-bodies have a certified judging program like the WBO, maybe if they all had similar protocols this fight would of been canceled.

                  Comment

                  • tokon
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 7648
                    • 1,828
                    • 1,300
                    • 42,234

                    #10
                    How can Taylor have won the round where he was deducted a point? In the absence of him scoring a knockdown, or somehow otherwise decisively winning the round in a completely dominant manner, the best he could have gotten was a 9-9 round?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP