Boxers with double standards

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • i love boxing
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2017
    • 1955
    • 400
    • 67
    • 7,026

    #11
    36 year old Floyd cherry picked a 23 year old Canelo

    But 40 year old Floyd should have moved up to 160 and fought Canelo again, makes no sense at all.

    Comment

    • KillaCamNZ
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2016
      • 3967
      • 200
      • 156
      • 29,082

      #12
      Originally posted by BodyBagz

      1) Lewis was more shot than Mike. Had fought way more legit opponents than Mike.
      2) Mike wasn't angling for last payday vs Lewis. Spinks was not in it to win it. Clearly.
      3) For a Mike fan to credit him for beating Holmes, who was languishing on his sofa, makes sense. At no point in Mike's career did he ever beat a worthy opponent who wasn't the worst version
      4) Mike would be reduced to a journeyman in any other era except this one we're in now.
      5) Fury should never be mentioned with guys like Shavers, much less Ali.
      6) We agree on Rocky. Sign of the times.
      No matter what you say - you deserve props for the Jimmy Thunder sig. Respect.

      A mate of mine used to spar with Jimmy when he was young - said the way Jimmy hit him was unlike anything else he's felt in in his life. And a bloody nice guy to boot.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP