But if Cotto was favorite 2:1 that would be sufficient?
To pretend that either fighter is a virtual dead cert to win is just ridiculous. 2:1 implies that one of the fighters is a virtual dead cert - but you're just being ****** again as you are well aware that I think Cotto ought to be the narrow favourite to win (and that I wouldn't be at all surprised if Pac won) - and 2:1 is a very long way from being narrow, so why one earth did you imply that I think it should be 2:1 in favour of Cotto???
I've had enough of responding to idiotic posts like the above one, so I won't respond to your posts in future.
Cotto is da real P4P best. He fights undefeated champs like quintana n torres n kos them. Fights tough opposition like marg, mosley, corley, judah, n clottey among others n wins. Never denies a challenge like fakeweather n calslappy!
All we can do is speculate right now. Both fighters got good challenges in front of them and this is boxing anything can happen. Still either can win impressivelly or have a good showing on the losing side. The upcomming performance is gonna dictate how the future matches are gonna shape. On a win either can stink up the bout or end in a clash of head hurting the marketability of the fight.
In these fights I favor the natuarally bigger fighters. Not only they are bigger but they have a lot of skills.
I believe it will be his best option instead of trying out box PBF. That will there be a risk for him to get koed?? Yes but i see a higher risk of him trying to out box PBF hwich i beleive he will not be capable of doing.
I beleive that the sense around the "experts" of boxing and probably the odds (bets) will favor Paquiao for the fight.
I never said on the 2 post that you replied to, that Cotto is the favorite. I do beleive he has enough skills to win this fight but that is just my opinion and for that to happen Cotto will need to come in the best condition of his entire career to keep up with the constant movement and speed while being able to try to conect as much possible also with out getting tired in the later roounds (tough task).
What I did say was that Cotto's advantage in weight and probably power would be leveled by Pacman other advantages, meaning speed, stamina, movement, better corner, etc...
You can make a case of Cotto being the slight favorite, the very few times DelaHoya imposed his size on Pac he did hit him and moved him back. Pac as great as he is, he is being rated on the DelaHoya and Hatton destruction. Unless Cotto takes his weight training to extreme and is not able to have a size advantage on fight night is the only negative I can see so far.
Like I said before, this is gonna be Hopkins Delahoya all over again.
If Manny Pacquiao can overcome the tough challenge of WBO welterweight champion Miguel Cotto, he says the next logical fight would be a clash with Floyd Mayweather Jr. Pacquiao challenges Cotto on November 14, while Mayweather goes against Juan Manuel Marquez on Saturday night at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas. Both boxers would have to win their fights for their bout to stay on course. [details]
LOL, it's as if he has already beaten Cotto or something. He should worry about the guy that he is getting ready to fight, he would be extremely foolish to overlook Cotto. I don't have a good feeling right now regarding Pacquiao because he appears to be overlooking Cotto for some reason. Manny has a speed advantage but he will need to be extremely focused to outbox Cotto.
There isn't a KO portion, learn to read. There's a column for win/loss type, and in that column it says UD, SD, MD, KO or TKO as appropriate.
Why do you cut out my entire post? It makes your reply very misleading. But I'm pretty sure you are aware of that. Like I said when has a announcer stated one number for KO's and another for TKO's? Exactly they both fall under the category of KO's...
Here is Cotto's record from a Cotto fan. No breakdown of TKO's.
To pretend that either fighter is a virtual dead cert to win is just ridiculous. 2:1 implies that one of the fighters is a virtual dead cert - but you're just being ****** again as you are well aware that I think Cotto ought to be the narrow favourite to win (and that I wouldn't be at all surprised if Pac won) - and 2:1 is a very long way from being narrow, so why one earth did you imply that I think it should be 2:1 in favour of Cotto???
I've had enough of responding to idiotic posts like the above one, so I won't respond to your posts in future.
Why not post my entire post? Where is the link where you stated experts say 2:1 odds for PAC is irrational? You don't have to respond but you will be called out on your nonsense from this point foward...
Comment