Rank Canelo's possibly opponents best to worst

[BendOver]

Rank these fighters. Who could give closest fight or easiest fight to Canelo?

Dimitry Bivol
Artur Beterbiev
Joe Smith Jr.
Jermall Charlo
David Benavidez
Demetrius Andrade
Gennady Golovkin
John Ryder

I'll put Morell jr. Before ryder

[ReggieKray]

He served the penalty. That isn’t exonerated. Exonerated means you were cleared on all charges. That didn’t happen.

Exonerated - absolve (someone) from blame for a fault or wrongdoing, especially after due consideration of the case.

Which is exactly what happened and further more they ended up reducing the limit of the trace amount that can be present in one's blood which is still far less than what Canelo had. Canelo also took a hair follicle test which again is more thorough and came back negative. Lastly Canelo has been the most tested fighter in the decade.

All this BS conspiracy is just you all being racist ***s. There are no more excuses. When everythig has been proven and cleared, you all chose to hatefully continue to spread lies to disparage Canelo.

POS tbc claims to be a Christian and yet has no problem baring false witness. Fkn hypocrite bastard.

You all just need to own up to your alls Bullshit. It's old and annoying. I'm pretty sure you all aren't getting paid to spread lies about Canelo but you all continue to pollute this forum with slander and you all know it...fkn pathetic you don't have anything else better to do.

[TernceBudCharlo]

Exonerated - absolve (someone) from blame for a fault or wrongdoing, especially after due consideration of the case.

Which is exactly what happened and further more they ended up reducing the limit of the trace amount that can be present in one's blood which is still far less than what Canelo had. Canelo also took a hair follicle test which again is more thorough and came back negative. Lastly Canelo has been the most tested fighter in the decade.

All this BS conspiracy is just you all being racist ***s. There are no more excuses. When everythig has been proven and cleared, you all chose to hatefully continue to spread lies to disparage Canelo.

POS tbc claims to be a Christian and yet has no problem baring false witness. Fkn hypocrite bastard.

You all just need to own up to your alls Bullshit. It's old and annoying. I'm pretty sure you all aren't getting paid to spread lies about Canelo but you all continue to pollute this forum with slander and you all know it...fkn pathetic you don't have anything else better to do.

Changing the rules is not exoneration lol. If I steal $1000 from a bank, and the government changes the law 6 months later saying it's no longer a crime to steal less than $2000, that still makes me a thief.

False witness? How? Don't tell me I'm violating the 10 commandments. It's a FACT that he failed the drug test. Only god knows if he failed because of cheating or tainted beef, but if you ask me I think you have to be a FOOL to believe the tainted beef excuse.

[Ctx94]

John Ryder?
who the **** is John rider? lmfao

joe smith jr??? Ain’t he a construction worker???

aint he the construction worker that beat a 50 year old Hopkins???

every time they ask former multiple time champions who were in Andrade’s amateur class they all say Andrade was the best one out of the whole class...

co-signed by multiple multiple time champions...

im just sayin no bias just a fan of boxing

this don’t make sense lol

[SplitSecond]

John Ryder?
who the **** is John rider? lmfao

joe smith jr??? Ain’t he a construction worker???

aint he the construction worker that beat a 50 year old Hopkins???

every time they ask former multiple time champions who were in Andrade’s amateur class they all say Andrade was the best one out of the whole class...

co-signed by multiple multiple time champions...

im just sayin no bias just a fan of boxing

this don’t make sense lol

The guy that beat the #1 ranked SMW before Canelo.

[just the facts]

Exonerated - absolve (someone) from blame for a fault or wrongdoing, especially after due consideration of the case.

Which is exactly what happened and further more they ended up reducing the limit of the trace amount that can be present in one's blood which is still far less than what Canelo had. Canelo also took a hair follicle test which again is more thorough and came back negative. Lastly Canelo has been the most tested fighter in the decade.

All this BS conspiracy is just you all being racist ***s. There are no more excuses. When everythig has been proven and cleared, you all chose to hatefully continue to spread lies to disparage Canelo.

POS tbc claims to be a Christian and yet has no problem baring false witness. Fkn hypocrite bastard.

You all just need to own up to your alls Bullshit. It's old and annoying. I'm pretty sure you all aren't getting paid to spread lies about Canelo but you all continue to pollute this forum with slander and you all know it...fkn pathetic you don't have anything else better to do.

Canelo was NEVER absolved. That flat out didn’t happen. What did happen is the 6 month suspension.

[TernceBudCharlo]

Canelo was NEVER absolved. That flat out didn’t happen. What did happen is the 6 month suspension.

Although not all canelo fans are bad, many know they lost the debate, intellectually, so they have to kick, scream, cry and resort to name calling. But facts are facts, he failed a drug test. Slander has to be something false, and he failed a drug test period. Its the worst character flaw in the world because in boxing you have a license to inflict bodily harm legally. When you cheat to increase that bodily harm you do to your opponent, you are no better than any other violent criminal. Anyone who defends this, just proof of their moral and character flaws. Even if it was tacos, as an athlete you have an ethical responsibility to make sure that **** never gets in your system period. It showed a great character flaw in canelo as well as anyone who defends him.

[Fangedgrowl]

I am not even putting Ryder on there.
1. Beterbiev: Strong , can fight at Mid range and at Close range. Is a huge 175 pounder.
2. Bivol: Good , solid fighter, Tall. Can move some.
3. GGG: His jab will still hit Canelo, Canelo also doesnt throw as many combos as he use to. GGG matches up well with Canelo.
4. Benavidez: Big guy, throws alot of punches, I still Think Canelo wins though. Picks him apart.
5. Joe Smith. : Big 175 pounder . Hits really hard. Is tough.
6. Andrade: Slick, yet is a runner. Hard to hit when he is moving.
7. Charlo: Is not the slickster everyone thinks. He is a good combo puncher, yet Canelo is faster and will kill his body. Charlo comes straight in and fights tall. Easy to kill the body.

[lopetego]

Assuming the fight gets made next May...

1. Beterbiev - too big, too strong, too relentless
2. Bivol - too big and skilfful


3. Joe Smith Jr. - same as Beterbiev with less skills
4. Benavidez - tall, rangy, fast hads, great stamina
5. Andrade - that style of his makes anyone look bad


6. Charlo
7. Triple Geezer
8. John Ryder

1-2. By far the toughest matches ginger could take. 50-50 matches or even Canelo as underdog in both

3-5. They could pose some problems, but I'd still favor Canelo to beat them

6-8. The most easily winnable fights for ginger. Unless GGG can find a time machine and not be the washed up version that needed a gift against Derevyanchenko, because that version gets wrecked by Canelo

[ReggieKray]

Changing the rules is not exoneration lol. If I steal $1000 from a bank, and the government changes the law 6 months later saying it's no longer a crime to steal less than $2000, that still makes me a thief.

False witness? How? Don't tell me I'm violating the 10 commandments. It's a FACT that he failed the drug test. Only god knows if he failed because of cheating or tainted beef, but if you ask me I think you have to be a FOOL to believe the tainted beef excuse.

I'm realizing arguing with someone with low comprehension and inability of making an coherent argument in English is hopeless. You're analogy cringly misses the point entirely. The exoneration has nothing to do with the rule change. The exoneration occurred when they determined Canelo was absolved from any blame or wrong doing. Read that a few times please. Your simple mind doesn't seem to be registering that well.

The fact that he barely failed a test also doesn't mean anything. You repeating that over and over again also does not mean anything or prove guilt.

If you plant drugs in your cousins car and cops stop, find and arrest him for those drugs. Sure he got arrested for wrong doing, but if he later proves they were yours and is cleared for wrong doing then he is free.. What kind of moron is going to sit here and continue to argue he is guilty because he was initially arrested and infer nothing else matter after that fact... Fckinggggg dumb...

Sound like you are wanting to speak for God. You need to check your faith. You have zero proof yet you slander freely. You're a hypocritical fk.