Tweet
I'll keep it pretty simple.
We argue pretty consistently over what it means to hold a WBC Franchise title.
I went to the bodies for official responses. I have yet to get one. I figured, if they're going to ignore me I may as well try my shot at getting others to ask them until they answer someone.
That's it, that's the entire plan. Contact the IBF, WBA, and WBO and ask them why the refuse to acknowledge George at Lightweight as WBC champion but do acknowledge Estrada at Super Flyweight as WBC champion.
Or any form of that, that asks for clarification as to when the bodies recognize WBC-F and when they don't.
Basically, stop crying and assuming at one another and berate the powers that be until they give a real verdict. Or don't, I don't hardly give a ****, this can be where my investigation ends and from here I'll just explain the WBC-F means **** all because no one, not the WBC, not the other bodies, will define it, or what it means to them.
We argue pretty consistently over what it means to hold a WBC Franchise title.
I went to the bodies for official responses. I have yet to get one. I figured, if they're going to ignore me I may as well try my shot at getting others to ask them until they answer someone.
That's it, that's the entire plan. Contact the IBF, WBA, and WBO and ask them why the refuse to acknowledge George at Lightweight as WBC champion but do acknowledge Estrada at Super Flyweight as WBC champion.
Or any form of that, that asks for clarification as to when the bodies recognize WBC-F and when they don't.
Basically, stop crying and assuming at one another and berate the powers that be until they give a real verdict. Or don't, I don't hardly give a ****, this can be where my investigation ends and from here I'll just explain the WBC-F means **** all because no one, not the WBC, not the other bodies, will define it, or what it means to them.