Fury vs Vitali

[The_Demon]

How would Fury get on against a prime Vitali Klitschko?

[FlatLine]

A prime Vitali wins if he can control Fury with the power jab. But Fury's footwork would give him problems too. Just think Vitali's power shots land enough to make Fury fight cautious jittery, and reduce his punch output. If Vitali doesn't knock him out he'll probably win a close points decision. Way different fighter compared to Wladimir.

[Dakuwaqa]

Vitali. Prime Wlad beats Fury too.

[deathofaclown]

Vitali was a big stiff idiot. Best known for getting his face caved in by an out of shape old Lewis, after a few rounds of being competitive. Also quit in his corner v Byrd, literally asked to be pulled out. Plenty of fighters have carried on with that injury. Nobody who asks to be pulled out has the heart and minerals to beat Fury. Do you think Fury would ever ask that?

what is Vitali’s best win? His resume is up there among the worst in terms of champions. No notable wins at all. Arguably the most overrated fighter of all time with the heart the size of a pea.

Fury whoops any versions of Vitali or Wlad. He’s just a stylistic nightmare for Wlad, even though Wlad was a top
fighter. Vitali was a B level fighter with no good wins, a solid chin and no heart. Not enough to beat Fury.

[Dakuwaqa]

Vitali was a big stiff idiot. Best known for getting his face caved in by an out of shape old Lewis, after a few rounds of being competitive. Also quit in his corner v Byrd, literally asked to be pulled out. Plenty of fighters have carried on with that injury. Nobody who asks to be pulled out has the heart and minerals to beat Fury. Do you think Fury would ever ask that?

what is Vitali’s best win? His resume is up there among the worst in terms of champions. No notable wins at all. Arguably the most overrated fighter of all time with the heart the size of a pea.

Fury whoops any versions of Vitali or Wlad. He’s just a stylistic nightmare for Wlad, even though Wlad was a top
fighter. Vitali was a B level fighter with no good wins, a solid chin and no heart. Not enough to beat Fury.

He fought an old Wlad and it most certainly wasn’t a whooping. It was pretty much a stalemate they both should have lost.

[Scopedog]

I think they actually share a lot of attributes like a certain awkwardness and durability, but I feel like Fury has many more dimensions to his game, is taller and longer than Vitali unlike basically any of Vitali's opponents except maybe Lewis, and then Fury is taller and longer to a greater degree, has massively superior feet, ability to fight southpaw or orthdox and an excellent boxing brain that enables him to utilise his advantages to the max. As for Vitali's advantages he probably hits a little harder (though I'm not sure that's something to be certain of because Fury's shown his punches can be devastating when he fully loads up) and also might have an edge in physical strength, he was a huge guy and most of that was muscle as opposed to flab as opposed to Fury in most of his fights. I think Fury has too many clear edges overall to pick against him, though I'm sure it wouldn't be an easy win for him (and it probably wouldn't be by stoppage barring some sort of injury.)

[JakeTheBoxer]

Fury. Vitali was just a bigger and better version of Wilder. His resume is full of bums, while Fury beat his brother, who was better than Vitali.

[removed]

Fury would give him a boxing lesson. Vitali only ever faced one decent fighter, and that guy bashed his face in.

[juggernaut666]

Fury. Vitali was just a bigger and better version of Wilder. His resume is full of bums, while Fury beat his brother, who was better than Vitali.

Dumbest post candidate .

[PRINCEKOOL]

Vitali Kiltsckko had better stamina, was difficult to hit, could throw continuous combinations, and hit hard. Kiltschko is going to be right there, on Tyson Fury 'Fury's bamboozling tactics are not really going to give him much breathing space'. So for me whoever wins this fight, is the fighter who can fight better at mid-range and on the inside 'Those are the two attributes which win this fight'.

Kiltschko hands down, had a better mid-range game. He had a tremendous work-rate, and could throw constant combinations. Sharp and accurate punches. Fury does not really throw high class combinations, and is a bit of a mess at mid-range 'Even as the Riddler Fury he was clumsy at mid-range. Although Fury's inside fighting capability is better than his mid-range ability.

So this fight is most likely going to distance, vs Kronk Fury or The Riddler Fury? I think peak Vitali Kiltschko gets a points win over 'The Riddler' and stops 'Kronk Fury'.

The Riddler Fury, is the version of Tyson Fury who trained under Peter Fury. It is this style of fighting, and condition 'Which will enable Tyson Fury to be most competitive against Kiltschko'. And I will give Tyson Fury a chance dong really well.

Kronk Fury is by far too much of a mess, clumsy and right there to be hit. If Wilder can land on Fury in every single round of their 3rd fight, if Wallin can bust up Fury real good 'Then Fury is being subjected to heavy bombardment from start to finish by Kiltschko'.

Kronk Fury vs Vitali Kiltschko would be the most dramatic and brutal fight. But those combinations and the stamina of Kiltschko, is something Fury has never seen in another super-heavyweight.