Who is the better fighter between Canelo and Floyd?

[MONGOOSE66]

Neither were in their prime or best weight when they fought.

but now that we’ve seen more of Canelo career, objectively speaking who’s actually the better fighter between them?

Better boxer? Floyd all the way. Better fighter? I lean toward Canelo due to his power.

[Soccer69^]

The best person floyd fought was a 70 fight flyweight. The people Nell struggled to beat could floyd even best them? Lara, ggg, and who else did Nell struggle with? Would Nell struggle with Castillo or maiden a or a guy like dlh who'd lost a few before floyd fight?

I think Floyd does edge Golovkin, the head-movement would give GGG fits.

Canelo vs Maidana? Maidana's wild attacks throw Canelo off for a few rounds. Then he gasses and Canelo dominates the rest of the fight.

[JakeTheBoxer]

Floyd. Canelo struggles with top competition. Canelo in his prime lost to GGG and Lara.

[djtmal]

What is your argument for canelo being better?

Ok so how many all time greats did both beat in their prime.

Was Canelo a prime, all-time great when Floyd beat him.

I'm waiting.

[Larry the boss]

Ok so how many all time greats did both beat in their prime.

Was Canelo a prime, all-time great when Floyd beat him.

I'm waiting.

He was a unified young champ..Floyd was past prime at 36.

canelo is a damn good fighter..but all you are doing is trying to discredit a man with a far better resume who beat him while not giving me one reason canelo is better which is the topic on the thread

[El_Maldito_Rey]

He was a unified young champ..Floyd was past prime at 36.

canelo is a damn good fighter..but all you are doing is trying to discredit a man with a far better resume who beat him while not giving me one reason canelo is better which is the topic on the thread

Fraud doesn't have a "far better resume" than Canelo. Not even close.

[QueensburyRules]

Floyd. Canelo struggles with top competition. Canelo in his prime lost to GGG and Lara.

- - U lost U prime years to Lady Lara.

[djtmal]

He was a unified young champ..Floyd was past prime at 36.

canelo is a damn good fighter..but all you are doing is trying to discredit a man with a far better resume who beat him while not giving me one reason canelo is better which is the topic on the thread

Dude you going all around the mulberry bush.

Was Canelo, in his prime, when Floyd beat him? Yes or No.

If you felt without conviction that Canelo was at his absolute prime when Floyd beat him you would have said yes 2 days ago.

Just admit Floyd hasn't beaten an all time great fighter in their prime, and Canelo wasn't in his prime when he beat him.

[Larry the boss]

Dude you going all around the mulberry bush.

Was Canelo, in his prime, when Floyd beat him? Yes or No.

If you felt without conviction that Canelo was at his absolute prime when Floyd beat him you would have said yes 2 days ago.

Just admit Floyd hasn't beaten an all time great fighter in their prime, and Canelo wasn't in his prime when he beat him.

Wtf does this have to do with this thread? It's asking who is better and I answered

[Larry the boss]

Both are, or will be, All Time Greats. But I have to say Floyd at this moment. Names like Chicanito Hernandez, Corrales, Castillo, Pacman, and De La Hoya are much more attractive than GGG, Lara, Trout, Callum Smith, and Plant.

There is no arguing this....