Originally posted by illpapi
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Munguia: Adames Wasn't Ready To Fight February 19, We Moved Forward With Ballard
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Kannabis Kid View Post2nd time Adames wouldn't be ready for a fight seems like a pattern I wonder who is really stalling it since Adames won his fight in December so clean why wasn't he ready for February? It's called pastelitos he had too many over the break and blew up in weight like he always does. He called Munguia out after his fight but now he's not ready again so when Munguia signs to fight an actual undefeated fighter he's ducking and you're not buying it please man just another excuse. I can't wait until this fight actually happens and Munguia breaks down and stops Adames wonder what the excuses will be we can make a bet if you like.
Now, here are some facts for you. Munguia is 38-0 and has fought 16 more fights than Adames and yet Adames has the better resume. Now, those are the facts. When is your fighter going to fight someone of note when he's 68-0???? You tell me.Last edited by illpapi; 01-18-2022, 01:56 PM.charliepaerker likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by illpapi View Post
Do you ever speak with facts or just love to troll and then act like it's facts? If you notice when I say certain things I pretty much let it be known it's just my opinion. Again, seems very convenient (and again this is just my opinion) that Munguia didn't come out right off the bat and say he was ready for Adames or that a contract was sent or anything for that matter. Oh, but we are supposed to just believe that he said Adames was not ready. Were you there during the conversations? I am simply going by what I see. Again, if he really wanted to fight Adames would it have been a big deal if he added an extra two weeks or maybe three? In my opinion, Adames needs this fight more than Munguia does so I see no reason why he would not jump on it.
Now, here are some facts for you. Munguia is 38-0 and has fought 16 more fights than Adames and yet Adames has the better resume. Now, those are the facts. When is your fighter going to fight someone of note when he's 68-0???? You tell me.
Crazy right Munguia just turned 25 and he already has 38 fights yet Adames is older and has less fights if anything that makes him look bad just another Dominican with a padded record built in Santo Domingo. Please dude Adames resume is not better than Jaimes his only name win is against Sergey and even then he didn't look great in the 2nd half of that fight. Rosado fought both guys who beat Sergey as well so how are you just excluding that? In fact Rosado beat Jacobs and Jacobs clearly beat Sergey so Sergey is a step back from Rosado. Let's see what biased excuse you are going to come up with about Rosado, don't forget Charlo recently made a title defense against someone Munguia obliterated at 147 lbs.
Munguia knocks out Johnson in 6 but when Sergey does it in 12 it's a good win for Sergey. Munguia knocks out O'Sullivan but when BJS beats him by decision it's a good win for Saunders. Munguia knocks out Srzemeta in 6 but it's not ok because Golovkin did it in 7. It's funny man it's always something with you guys facts are laid out to be seen you can keep talking trash but Munguia is ahead of Adames in every aspect and he's younger ain't that some ****.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kannabis Kid View PostThe only thing Adames has over Munguia is a loss to some Brazilian he supposed to walk over can't say the same about Jaime though at least he picked up a belt at 154 something Adames failed at. Munguia would've never lost to Patrick no way but the blueprint on how to beat Carlos was laid out in that fight and I will bet that Munguia knocks out Adames.
Crazy right Munguia just turned 25 and he already has 38 fights yet Adames is older and has less fights if anything that makes him look bad just another Dominican with a padded record built in Santo Domingo. Please dude Adames resume is not better than Jaimes his only name win is against Sergey and even then he didn't look great in the 2nd half of that fight. Rosado fought both guys who beat Sergey as well so how are you just excluding that? In fact Rosado beat Jacobs and Jacobs clearly beat Sergey so Sergey is a step back from Rosado. Let's see what biased excuse you are going to come up with about Rosado, don't forget Charlo recently made a title defense against someone Munguia obliterated at 147 lbs.
Munguia knocks out Johnson in 6 but when Sergey does it in 12 it's a good win for Sergey. Munguia knocks out O'Sullivan but when BJS beats him by decision it's a good win for Saunders. Munguia knocks out Srzemeta in 6 but it's not ok because Golovkin did it in 7. It's funny man it's always something with you guys facts are laid out to be seen you can keep talking trash but Munguia is ahead of Adames in every aspect and he's younger ain't that some ****.
"Carlos Adames Rejects Munguia's Claim: Who Said I Wasn't Ready To Fight on February 19?"
“Why would he say I wasn’t ready? His team never contacted my team. I am ready now. I can fight him tomorrow. The only reason I would wait until tomorrow is so that we can weigh in today,” Adames stated.
LMAO....
But I'm sure you'll let us all know why Munguia gets a pass. We are all pretty sure Carlos is the one lying here even though it's pretty obvious that he needs this fight more than Munguia.
Last edited by illpapi; 01-18-2022, 05:31 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by illpapi View Post
Man, I'll just leave it as is. But it's funny though that not long after that we get this:
"Carlos Adames Rejects Munguia's Claim: Who Said I Wasn't Ready To Fight on February 19?"
“Why would he say I wasn’t ready? His team never contacted my team. I am ready now. I can fight him tomorrow. The only reason I would wait until tomorrow is so that we can weigh in today,” Adames stated.
LMAO....
But I'm sure you'll let us all know why Munguia gets a pass. We are all pretty sure Carlos is the one lying here even though it's pretty obvious that he needs this fight more than Munguia.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kannabis Kid View PostAnd yet all the points I brought up in terms of resume and competition and you couldn't offer a counter at the end of the day they are going to fight they are on the same path and when it happens I don't want to hear excuses as to why Carlitos got knocked out. You can mention the new post all you want how come Adames never mentioned that they sent him a contract in the past and he rejected that one?
And if they do fight and Carlos gets knocked out as you say then I'll give Munguia credit. Let's just hope Carlos is not 52 years old by then.
Comment
-
Originally posted by illpapi View Post
Dude, I didn't want to offer a counter because you basically do the same thing to all my posts. But I bet you conveniently disregard that, correct? Hence, the reason why I didn't even bother anymore.
And if they do fight and Carlos gets knocked out as you say then I'll give Munguia credit. Let's just hope Carlos is not 52 years old by then.
Also nice built in excuse for when Carlos loses it's because of his age.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kannabis Kid View PostThe only thing Adames has over Munguia is a loss to some Brazilian he supposed to walk over can't say the same about Jaime though at least he picked up a belt at 154 something Adames failed at. Munguia would've never lost to Patrick no way but the blueprint on how to beat Carlos was laid out in that fight and I will bet that Munguia knocks out Adames.
Crazy right Munguia just turned 25 and he already has 38 fights yet Adames is older and has less fights if anything that makes him look bad just another Dominican with a padded record built in Santo Domingo. Please dude Adames resume is not better than Jaimes his only name win is against Sergey and even then he didn't look great in the 2nd half of that fight. Rosado fought both guys who beat Sergey as well so how are you just excluding that? In fact Rosado beat Jacobs and Jacobs clearly beat Sergey so Sergey is a step back from Rosado. Let's see what biased excuse you are going to come up with about Rosado, don't forget Charlo recently made a title defense against someone Munguia obliterated at 147 lbs.
Munguia knocks out Johnson in 6 but when Sergey does it in 12 it's a good win for Sergey. Munguia knocks out O'Sullivan but when BJS beats him by decision it's a good win for Saunders. Munguia knocks out Srzemeta in 6 but it's not ok because Golovkin did it in 7. It's funny man it's always something with you guys facts are laid out to be seen you can keep talking trash but Munguia is ahead of Adames in every aspect and he's younger ain't that some ****.
Check how long Johnson had been out of the ring.
Rosado was drained an entire weight class from 168 to 160.
Munguia wouldn't lose to a Patrick Texiera, but he'd lose to a much lesser fighter in Hogan?
Munguia has more fights as he turned pro 2 years earlier than Adames. But maybe you could tell me which year Adames should have been more active than he already has been?
Don't talk about padded records when the subject matter is Jaime Munguia. It's hilariously ironic.
Did Rosado fight the two fighters who beat Chenko whilst being seriously disadvantaged the way Munguia did? No, they didn't. 3 people have beaten Chenko. Charlo is the other one.
Rosado fought Jacobs 2 years after Chenko fought him. Jacobs had much more motivation when fighting Chenko. Completely different.
Jacobs did not clearly beat Chenko either. It was razor close in fact. I had it 6 rounds apiece but Jacobs coming out as a 1 point winner due to the KD. Learn to score fights. There was nothing clear at all.
What has the situation between Munguia/Adames got to do with Charlo fighting someone in a title defence that Munguia blew away at 147lbs? Nothing. It's just another one of your strawmen arguments.
Saunders fought O'Sullivan when he was prime and undefeated. Munguia fought him 7 years later when he was shot and many defeats later.
Munguia did it a round earlier than Golovkin because maybe Golovkin was near 40 years old and Kamil had just come off a KO stoppage loss to Golovkin when fighting Jaime. Maybe?
Jaime has already run away from mandatory shots. Only cowards run away from their mandatories. Who else can you think of that did the same?
Sorry, but it's just another pathetic attempt to defend a Mexican fighter when there is no justification to. No matter what they do, you'll defend it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
Making a fool out of yourself for this clown again i see. But hey, that's what biased nationalists do, right?
Check how long Johnson had been out of the ring.
Rosado was drained an entire weight class from 168 to 160.
Munguia wouldn't lose to a Patrick Texiera, but he'd lose to a much lesser fighter in Hogan?
Munguia has more fights as he turned pro 2 years earlier than Adames. But maybe you could tell me which year Adames should have been more active than he already has been?
Don't talk about padded records when the subject matter is Jaime Munguia. It's hilariously ironic.
Did Rosado fight the two fighters who beat Chenko whilst being seriously disadvantaged the way Munguia did? No, they didn't. 3 people have beaten Chenko. Charlo is the other one.
Rosado fought Jacobs 2 years after Chenko fought him. Jacobs had much more motivation when fighting Chenko. Completely different.
Jacobs did not clearly beat Chenko either. It was razor close in fact. I had it 6 rounds apiece but Jacobs coming out as a 1 point winner due to the KD. Learn to score fights. There was nothing clear at all.
What has the situation between Munguia/Adames got to do with Charlo fighting someone in a title defence that Munguia blew away at 147lbs? Nothing. It's just another one of your strawmen arguments.
Saunders fought O'Sullivan when he was prime and undefeated. Munguia fought him 7 years later when he was shot and many defeats later.
Munguia did it a round earlier than Golovkin because maybe Golovkin was near 40 years old and Kamil had just come off a KO stoppage loss to Golovkin when fighting Jaime. Maybe?
Jaime has already run away from mandatory shots. Only cowards run away from their mandatories. Who else can you think of that did the same?
Sorry, but it's just another pathetic attempt to defend a Mexican fighter when there is no justification to. No matter what they do, you'll defend it.
As far as the rest just a whole list of excuses once again hating on the Mexicans who wipe the floor with your favorite UK fighters. Always a reason and excuse for everything can never just give credit where it's due you truly are a sad individual little Sydney go crawl back to the dumpster your mother left you in.
Comment
Comment