Who is The More Acomplished fighter Golovkin or Crawford ?

[icha]

Who will you rank higher in your ATG list ?
better resume, etc..
vote and discuss...

[Boxing fan1981]

Had GGG beaten Canelo then I can see an argument for GGG. Once GGG stepped up the competition with Alvarez it was downhill after that.

So Crawford.

[icha]

Had GGG beaten Canelo then I can see an argument for GGG. Once GGG stepped up the competition with Alvarez it was downhill after that.

So Crawford.

i think is close, gggs best win is prime jacobs while buds is shopworn porter.. but clearly underachieved considering their talent and skills...

[daggum]

Had GGG beaten Canelo then I can see an argument for GGG. Once GGG stepped up the competition with Alvarez it was downhill after that.

So Crawford.

did he not beat him? if we are just going by official decisions then whats the point because we know money makers like floyd, canelo will never lose fights. even second tier frauds like ward are gifted fights to support their money making potential

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Big GGG fan but it’s definitely Crawford for me.

[ELPacman]

Pretty good similarities but Crawford for me. That despite Crawford doesn't have a real good true signature win on his resume. He has at least stayed consistent with dominating his opposition.

GGG, a lot would say he won the first fight with Canelo... At this point though, looking at it on paper, he has a draw and a loss to Canelo who is arguably his signature fight of his career. I can't see then how you would rate GGG higher than Bud.

[Boxing fan1981]

did he not beat him? if we are just going by official decisions then whats the point because we know money makers like floyd, canelo will never lose fights. even second tier frauds like ward are gifted fights to support their money making potential

Ok, and Danny Jacobs beat GGG. Dery beat GGG as well. They were both ROBBED. Or that only works when it’s your boy?

Whats the point if GGG is a money maker and can’t lose? They have to rob fighters to keep him relevant for the Canelo fight.

Let me guess, let’s jump back to official scorecards right?

[El_Mero]

Unified '35, undisputed at '40, belt holder and undefeated at '47 while all the other '47 contenders and Spence continue to duck him. Crawford by a wide margin.

[KillaMane26]

I picked wrong one, Crawford is and it's not close.

[daggum]

Ok, and Danny Jacobs beat GGG. Dery beat GGG as well. They were both ROBBED. Or that only works when it’s your boy?

Whats the point if GGG is a money maker and can’t lose? They have to rob fighters to keep him relevant for the Canelo fight.

Let me guess, let’s jump back to official scorecards right?

didnt i just say official decisions dont matter? why would i jump back to the official scorecards? should we use compubox to decide who wins as well? if you think jacobs beat ggg then ok. i didnt see that happening at all. just because a guy is a money maker doesnt mean every fight is a robbery. i thought ggg clearly beat jacobs, i thought he beat canelo in the first fight. i dont know why i would out source my opinino to 3 judges who ae clearly compromised politically. im not compromised. just a fan. maybe im biased but i try not to be. if you think ggg lost all those fights then yeah he wouldnt go down as some great fighter in your eyes