It seems as though Ennis is just as effective in the southpaw stance as he is in orthodox. Crawford has a tendency to be countered while in orthodox. In Shoutbox he is more defensive, but he isn't as powerful IMO. I think Ennis switch-hitting is in the same category as Hagle. Opinions?
Better Switch Hitter: Crawford or Ennis?
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
According to Jaron, Terence is mostly a southpaw
T’s southpaw work is MUCH BETTER than his orthy work
I want these guys to fight down the line. There’s overlap in their styles -
-
No surprise youre the first comment in a Jamal ennis thread
Keep it up and you'll be on par with BoxingIsGreat and his love for stank davisComment
-
Ennis can fluidly switch back and forth better than any fighter I can think of. Crawford might as well be a southpaw who fights orthodox occasionally nowadays.Comment
-
Get off my ****.
No surprise youre the first comment in a Jamal ennis thread
Keep it up and you'll be on par with BoxingIsGreat and his love for stank davisComment
-
Right now, with all he’s accomplished, you have to say Crawford but that might change in the near future.Comment
-
Comment
-
Hard to say. Is Crawford really still considered a switch hitter? he fights almost exclusively as a Southpaw since fighting bigger and better competition. Ennis hasn't really been tested so it's hard to say how effective he is when he switches.
Comment
Comment